WELLAND Roy · DNC - DENMARK
vs par split: bidding -2.92 · play -1.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -1.36/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.20/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 33.3% · declarer play 55.6% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 33.3% (3) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 62.5% (8) |
| Defence | · | 100.0% (3) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -14.00 (1) · a suit -3.00 (11)
vs par by level: part-score -4.14 (7) · game -4.50 (4) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.42/bd (-4.56 vs par · 9) · defending +1.97/bd (-2.00 vs par · 3)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.38/bd (-3.50 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable +1.73/bd (-4.33 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | Z.Mahmood | S.Skorchev – B.Popov | Closed | 12 | +18.7 | +1.56 | -3.92 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.9 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 23 | 4♠ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| +5.5 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 17 | 6♠ | ♥7 | = | +0 |
| +4.4 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 15 | 2♣x | ♥5 | -3 | -12 |
| +1.9 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 20 | 4♥ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +1.5 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 18 | 3♦ | ♦6 | = | +10 |
| +1.0 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 13 | 3♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 22 | 2♥ | ♠3 | = | -9 |
| -0.0 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 24 | 5♦x | ♣K | -2 | -4 |
| -0.2 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 19 | 2♠ | ♦5 | -1 | -5 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 14 | 3NT | ♥5 | +2 | -14 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 21 | 2♣ | ♥A | +3 | -6 |
| -4.2 | Semifinal | FNC - FRANCE | 16 | 2♥ | ♣5 | -2 | -7 |