FAILLA Giuseppe · BRIDGE ADDAURA ASD
vs par split: bidding +0.50 · play -0.25
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.42/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.05/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 71.4% #28 of 34 · declarer play 80.0% #19 of 35 · defence 82.4% #23 of 35
Bidding activity — not a pass: 34.8% #46 of 57 (31/89)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 71.4% (7) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 87.5% (8) |
| Defence | · | 82.4% (17) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 75.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (3) · a suit +0.28 (29)
vs par by level: part-score -1.00 (17) · game +1.92 (13) · slam +0.00 (2)
By role: declaring +0.93/bd (+0.07 vs par · 15) · defending -1.53/bd (+0.41 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.13/bd (-0.44 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +0.38/bd (+0.94 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | L.De Michelis | A.Levy – E.Mauberquez | Closed | 16 | +1.5 | +0.09 | -0.06 |
| Final | L.De Michelis | P.Zimmermann – M.Nowosadzki | Closed | 16 | -13.5 | -0.84 | +0.56 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.0 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 14 | 4♥ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| +6.5 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 9 | 4♥ | ♦K | +1 | +1 |
| +3.0 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 7 | 4♥ | ♦2 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.4 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 12 | 3♠ | ♠6 | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 16 | 3♠ | ♥K | -1 | -1 |
| +1.9 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 3 | 2NT | ♥4 | = | -1 |
| +1.9 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 8 | 2♦ | ♦5 | -1 | +3 |
| +1.5 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 15 | 3♥ | ♠8 | = | +0 |
| +1.4 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 15 | 2♠ | ♦T | -2 | -1 |
| +1.3 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 1 | 2♠ | ♣A | +1 | +1 |
| +1.3 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 16 | 4♥ | ♣T | = | +13 |
| +0.7 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 6 | 4♥ | ♣J | = | +1 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 2 | 2♥ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 7 | 4♥ | ♥J | +1 | +0 |
| +0.0 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 9 | 5♦ | ♥J | = | +0 |
| +0.0 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 14 | 5♦ | ♠K | = | +3 |
| -0.8 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 2 | 3♠ | ♥K | -2 | -1 |
| -1.4 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 10 | 4♥ | ♣5 | +2 | +13 |
| -1.8 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 8 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | -6 |
| -1.8 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 11 | 1NT | ♦5 | -1 | +1 |
| -1.9 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 13 | 3♦ | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -2.4 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 12 | 2♥ | ♠K | = | +1 |
| -2.5 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 10 | 6♥ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -2.7 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 4 | 2♥ | ♦3 | +1 | -12 |
| -2.8 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 11 | 2NT | ♥6 | -2 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 4 | 2♠ | ♥K | -2 | -7 |
| -3.1 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 13 | 3♠ | ♦2 | -1 | +1 |
| -3.1 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 1 | 4♥ | ♦9 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.2 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 5 | 2♠ | ♦A | = | -1 |
| -4.0 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 6 | 4♠ | ♥A | +1 | +0 |
| -4.3 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 3 | 6♥ | ♠T | = | +0 |
| -5.8 | Semifinal | FRENCH CHAMPIONS | 5 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +0 |