CSIPKA Szilvia · HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS

44rank
-9.4Butler · 16 bds
-0.59per board
±5.0swing
-0.62vs par /bd
+0.17adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.25 · play -0.38

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.75/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.17/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 75.0% · defence 85.7%

Bidding activity — not a pass: 44.2% (19/43)

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (2)·
Declarer play100.0% (1)66.7% (3)
Defence80.0% (5)100.0% (2)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT +1.29 (7) · a suit -2.11 (9)

vs par by level: part-score +0.14 (7) · game -1.43 (7) · slam -0.50 (2)

By role: declaring -1.76/bd (-3.67 vs par · 9) · defending +0.91/bd (+3.29 vs par · 7)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.85/bd (-1.00 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable +0.68/bd (-0.25 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalO.HegedusN.Senior – N.SmithClosed16-9.4-0.59-0.62

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+9.0SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS214♣♦8-6+10
+5.9SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS291NT♠5=+5
+4.3SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS223NT♥6-1+5
+4.3SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS306NT♥2+1+11
+1.0SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS312♥♣4+2-6
-0.1SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS323♣♠Q-1+8
-0.3SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS193NT♠4-2+6
-0.3SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS273NT♥2-3+2
-0.6SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS174♥♠2+2-1
-0.6SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS263♣♠4+1+0
-1.3SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS181♦♠K+4-6
-3.0SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS243NT♦6+2-10
-3.1SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS232♠♦K+2-10
-3.7SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS285♦♥T=-2
-10.0SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS203NT♣K=-10
-10.9SemifinalENGLISH CHAMPIONS256♦♠K-1-12