PEKOZ Eser · TURKISH CHAMPIONS
53rank
-40.9Butler · 16 bds
-2.56per board
±4.7swing
-2.00vs par /bd
-1.30adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +1.26/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.30/bd
Bidding activity — not a pass: 42.6% (20/47)
vs par by strain: NT -2.67 (9) · a suit -1.14 (7)
vs par by level: part-score +3.00 (4) · game -4.00 (11) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring -2.47/bd (-3.90 vs par · 10) · defending -2.70/bd (+1.17 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -3.08/bd (-0.75 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -2.04/bd (-3.25 vs par · 8)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | D.Gunay | C.Pomares Y De Morant – C.Golin | Open | 16 | -40.9 | -2.56 | -2.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.7 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 30 | 3NT | -2 | +6 | |
| +2.3 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 29 | 1NT | -1 | +11 | |
| +1.4 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 25 | 1NT | +1 | +0 | |
| +1.0 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 27 | 4♥ | = | +3 | |
| +0.7 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 24 | 4♥ | +1 | -11 | |
| +0.2 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 21 | 1NT | -1 | +1 | |
| +0.1 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 23 | 5♣ | +2 | +10 | |
| -0.6 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 19 | 4♠ | +1 | +0 | |
| -1.1 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 18 | 3NT | = | +1 | |
| -1.1 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 26 | 2♠ | +1 | +0 | |
| -3.9 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 31 | 3NT | -1 | -5 | |
| -5.9 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 22 | 3NT | +3 | -13 | |
| -6.3 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 17 | 3NT | -2 | -11 | |
| -7.2 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 32 | 6♦ | = | +0 | |
| -10.6 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 28 | 4♠ | = | -10 | |
| -13.6 | Final | PALCAN BRIDGE | 20 | 3NT | -3 | -14 |