NETTLETON Diana · ENGLISH CHAMPIONS
vs par split: bidding +1.19 · play +0.31
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.17/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.43/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 38 · declarer play 83.3% #15 of 38 · defence 80.0% #26 of 39
Bidding activity — not a pass: 46.2% #6 of 49 (42/91)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 75.0% (4) |
| Defence | · | 80.0% (5) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -2.00 (7) · a suit +0.76 (25)
vs par by level: part-score -0.47 (17) · game -1.25 (12) · slam +9.33 (3)
By role: declaring -1.23/bd (-1.73 vs par · 22) · defending +1.88/bd (+4.30 vs par · 10)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.10/bd (+0.38 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -0.62/bd (-0.06 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | S.Brock | J.Hegedus – J.Jalsovszky | Open | 16 | -20.4 | -1.27 | -1.19 |
| Final | S.Brock | C.Castignani – E.Duboin | Closed | 16 | +12.1 | +0.76 | +1.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.7 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 10 | 6♣ | ♦2 | -2 | +17 |
| +9.8 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 1 | 6♥ | ♥9 | -1 | +11 |
| +4.6 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 5 | 2♠ | ♦A | -2 | +5 |
| +4.3 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 22 | 3NT | -1 | +5 | |
| +4.2 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 12 | 3♠ | ♥A | +1 | +7 |
| +2.3 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 15 | 1NT | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.1 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 25 | 5♣ | +2 | +1 | |
| +1.7 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 8 | 1♦ | ♣A | -1 | +3 |
| +1.3 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 29 | 2♦ | -1 | +0 | |
| +0.9 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 9 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 14 | 5♦ | ♠K | = | +3 |
| +0.4 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 3 | 3♠x | ♦A | -5 | +8 |
| +0.4 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 4 | 3♥ | ♠8 | = | -6 |
| -0.1 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 13 | 3♦ | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -0.3 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 6 | 4♥ | ♣J | +1 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 18 | 1♦ | +5 | -6 | |
| -0.6 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 17 | 4♥ | +2 | -1 | |
| -0.6 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 26 | 3♣ | +1 | +0 | |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 27 | 3♥ | = | +1 | |
| -1.0 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 31 | 2♥ | = | -7 | |
| -1.1 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 11 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | +2 |
| -1.3 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 32 | 2♥ | +1 | +7 | |
| -1.6 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 28 | 3NT | +2 | +0 | |
| -2.1 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 19 | 3NT | -1 | +5 | |
| -2.6 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 21 | 3♥ | = | +0 | |
| -3.0 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 24 | 3NT | +2 | -10 | |
| -3.1 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 23 | 2♠ | +2 | -10 | |
| -3.4 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 20 | 3♠ | -3 | -4 | |
| -4.4 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 16 | 4♣ | ♣8 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.7 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 2 | 4♥ | ♠Q | -1 | -6 |
| -7.7 | Semifinal | HUNGARIAN CHAMPIONS | 30 | 7♠ | = | +0 | |
| -14.0 | Final | GSAD IDEA BRIDGE TORINO | 7 | 3NT | ♦2 | -3 | -14 |