GIERULSKI Boguslaw · BRIDGESCANNER
vs par split: bidding +1.43 · play +0.49
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.10/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.06/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% #21 of 56 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 56 · defence 90.3% #23 of 56
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (4) | 90.9% (11) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (6) |
| Defence | 87.5% (8) | 91.3% (23) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 71.4% (7)
vs par by strain: NT +1.80 (15) · a suit +1.97 (32)
vs par by level: part-score +2.56 (18) · game +1.48 (27) · slam +2.00 (2)
By role: declaring -0.36/bd (-0.69 vs par · 16) · defending +0.70/bd (+3.26 vs par · 31)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.63/bd (+2.33 vs par · 24) · not vulnerable -0.55/bd (+0.71 vs par · 24)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | J.Skrzypczak | M.Klukowski – J.Kalita | Closed | 16 | -3.8 | -0.24 | +1.31 |
| Semifinal | J.Skrzypczak | J.Kalita – M.Klukowski | Open | 16 | -25.8 | -1.61 | -1.19 |
| Final | J.Skrzypczak | C.Kristoffersen – K.Bogo | Closed | 16 | +31.4 | +1.96 | +4.44 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.2 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 31 | 7NT | ♣3 | -1 | +17 |
| +10.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 12 | 4♥ | ♣K | = | +8 |
| +9.0 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 32 | 3♦ | ♠9 | = | +11 |
| +8.6 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 23 | 4♠ | ♦Q | -1 | +6 |
| +7.6 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 32 | 5♥x | ♥9 | -3 | -4 |
| +6.8 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 7 | 4♠ | ♣A | -1 | +12 |
| +6.8 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 18 | 5♦ | ♠6 | +1 | +14 |
| +5.8 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 8 | 3NT | ♥2 | -3 | +14 |
| +5.3 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 3 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | +7 |
| +5.2 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 26 | 1NT | ♣A | -1 | +12 |
| +4.7 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 23 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | +6 |
| +4.0 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 29 | 4♠ | ♦J | -1 | +6 |
| +3.9 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 5 | 4♥ | ♦Q | = | +11 |
| +3.6 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 22 | 2♠ | ♦A | = | +5 |
| +2.6 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 19 | 1NT | ♣J | = | +5 |
| +2.0 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 14 | 3♥ | ♦K | = | +1 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 1 | 2NT | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 20 | 2♦ | ♣6 | -1 | +5 |
| +0.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 27 | 4♥ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| +0.0 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 27 | 3NT | ♠6 | -1 | -10 |
| -0.1 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 10 | 3♣ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 17 | 3NT | ♠5 | +1 | +10 |
| -0.3 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 17 | 3NT | ♣6 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 21 | 2NT | ♠5 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 24 | 5♣x | ♥K | -2 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 30 | 2♠ | ♦Q | -1 | -2 |
| -0.6 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 26 | 2♦ | ♦4 | = | -2 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 2 | 2♥ | ♦7 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.9 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 6 | 3NT | ♣4 | +3 | -2 |
| -1.4 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 21 | 2♠ | ♣5 | +1 | +7 |
| -1.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 15 | 3♠ | ♥K | = | +2 |
| -1.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 31 | 4♠ | ♣J | -1 | -6 |
| -2.0 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 28 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | -7 |
| -2.1 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 28 | 3NT | ♠5 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.4 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 24 | 5♦ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 16 | 1NT | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 25 | 4♥ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -3.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 11 | 3♥ | ♣A | -1 | -2 |
| -4.5 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 22 | 5♦ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -4.6 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 29 | 4♠ | ♣5 | = | +0 |
| -4.6 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 20 | 3NT | ♥9 | = | -10 |
| -4.8 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 18 | 5♦ | ♥A | = | +1 |
| -5.4 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 4 | 4♥ | ♦Q | = | +1 |
| -6.4 | Final | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 30 | 3♦ | ♣K | +1 | +5 |
| -8.8 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 19 | 2♦x | ♣9 | -2 | -2 |
| -10.1 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 13 | 7♦x | ♠A | -1 | -13 |
| -10.7 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 25 | 3NTx | ♠8 | -2 | -12 |
| -14.2 | Semifinal | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 9 | Pass | -17 |