HANLON Tom · IRISH CHAMPIONS
vs par split: bidding +1.44 · play +1.34
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -1.08/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.65/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% #26 of 56 · declarer play 91.7% #7 of 56 · defence 88.9% #29 of 56
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 70.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 90.0% (10) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 85.7% (14) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 60.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 80.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT +1.29 (7) · a suit +3.20 (25)
vs par by level: part-score +2.36 (11) · game +2.67 (18) · slam +5.00 (3)
By role: declaring +2.22/bd (+0.86 vs par · 14) · defending +3.12/bd (+4.28 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +4.19/bd (+4.62 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +1.26/bd (+0.94 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | C.Boland | M.Pilipovic – O.Stanicic | Closed | 16 | +23.7 | +1.48 | +1.81 |
| Final | C.Boland | J.Wojcieszek – R.Marks | Open | 16 | +63.5 | +3.97 | +3.75 |
| Final | C.Boland | J.Wojcieszek – R.Marks | Open | 0 | +0.0 | +0.00 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +16.0 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 12 | 6♥x | ♣J | = | +16 |
| +13.9 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 15 | 4♦x | ♣T | -4 | +12 |
| +10.9 | Semifinal | JT2 | 4 | 2♣x | ♣5 | = | +13 |
| +10.6 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 14 | 6♣ | ♦J | -1 | +10 |
| +10.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 7 | 5♥ | ♣3 | -3 | +14 |
| +9.9 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 10 | 4♠ | ♦T | -2 | +13 |
| +5.4 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 4 | 4♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +4.6 | Semifinal | JT2 | 8 | 3NT | ♥2 | -2 | +14 |
| +4.6 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 11 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +8 |
| +4.6 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 16 | 4♥ | ♦6 | = | +0 |
| +3.6 | Semifinal | JT2 | 15 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | +6 |
| +3.4 | Semifinal | JT2 | 13 | 5♦ | ♥9 | = | +0 |
| +3.1 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 8 | 2♠ | ♥Q | -1 | +4 |
| +2.7 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 13 | 3NT | ♣2 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 11 | 4♥x | ♣A | -2 | +5 |
| +2.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 12 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -3 | -4 |
| +1.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 6 | 3NT | ♠6 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Semifinal | JT2 | 14 | 2♥ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | JT2 | 1 | 1NT | ♣3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.7 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 5 | 4♥ | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 9 | 6♥ | ♠2 | = | -11 |
| +0.1 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 2 | 4♠ | ♥6 | +1 | +10 |
| -0.2 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 6 | 3♣ | ♥A | -2 | +1 |
| -0.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 10 | 2♠ | ♣A | -1 | -1 |
| -0.8 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 3 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | -10 |
| -1.8 | Semifinal | JT2 | 2 | 2♥ | ♦9 | +2 | -2 |
| -1.9 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 1 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 16 | 1NT | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 7 | 4♥ | ♣5 | = | -9 |
| -2.6 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 9 | 2♥ | ♣3 | +1 | -1 |
| -5.1 | Semifinal | JT2 | 3 | 3NT | ♥T | -1 | -5 |
| -7.7 | Semifinal | JT2 | 5 | 2♠ | ♥J | = | +0 |