ZIMMERMANN Pierre · Monaco FMB
vs par split: bidding -0.97 · play -0.67
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.08/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.72/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 88.9% #13 of 66 · declarer play 68.4% #49 of 66 · defence 92.0% #10 of 66
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 87.5% (8) |
| Declarer play | 60.0% (5) | 71.4% (14) |
| Defence | 100.0% (3) | 90.9% (22) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (5) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -4.80 (15) · a suit -0.78 (55)
vs par by level: part-score -0.89 (27) · game -1.68 (38) · slam -5.40 (5)
By role: declaring -0.91/bd (-2.62 vs par · 45) · defending -0.60/bd (+0.12 vs par · 25)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.79/bd (-1.57 vs par · 35) · not vulnerable -0.80/bd (-1.71 vs par · 35)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | F.Multon | G.Matushko – A.Sterkin | Open | 10 | +19.2 | +1.92 | +1.50 |
| Round 2 | F.Multon | M.Barel – Y.Zack | Closed | 10 | -15.6 | -1.56 | +0.60 |
| Round 5 | F.Multon | S.De Wijs – B.Muller | Closed | 10 | -1.3 | -0.13 | -1.70 |
| Round 7 | F.Multon | G.Hallberg – D.Patterson | Closed | 10 | -24.3 | -2.43 | -4.90 |
| Round 8 | F.Multon | K.Araszkiewicz – K.Kotorowicz | Closed | 10 | -13.1 | -1.31 | -5.80 |
| Round 9 | F.Multon | A.Levin – Y.Roll | Open | 10 | -20.8 | -2.08 | -2.10 |
| Round 10 | F.Multon | B.Van Den Bos – J.Van Lankveld | Open | 10 | +0.2 | +0.02 | +0.90 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.0 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 20 | 3♣x | ♣K | -1 | +10 |
| +6.5 | Round 1 | Lazy | 4 | 4♠x | ♥A | = | +14 |
| +4.9 | Round 8 | Connector | 16 | 2NT | ♦2 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.5 | Round 1 | Lazy | 2 | 3NT | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| +3.8 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 1 | 6♦ | ♣A | = | -2 |
| +3.5 | Round 1 | Lazy | 8 | 1NTx | ♥4 | -1 | +0 |
| +3.4 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 13 | 2♠ | ♦3 | -2 | +3 |
| +3.0 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 25 | 5♣x | ♠3 | -3 | +0 |
| +2.7 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 7 | 4♠ | ♠6 | = | +13 |
| +2.5 | Round 1 | Lazy | 5 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | -1 |
| +2.5 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 18 | 2♠ | ♠8 | +1 | +8 |
| +2.2 | Round 1 | Lazy | 3 | 3♠ | ♥2 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.2 | Round 8 | Connector | 14 | 3NT | ♥A | +2 | +1 |
| +2.1 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 6 | 5♣ | ♦A | +1 | -1 |
| +1.8 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 2 | 3♦ | ♥Q | = | +0 |
| +1.5 | Round 1 | Lazy | 7 | 3NT | ♠2 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.4 | Round 8 | Connector | 11 | 2♠ | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 12 | 5♦ | ♣5 | = | +2 |
| +1.2 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 26 | 3♠ | ♠4 | = | +6 |
| +1.0 | Round 1 | Lazy | 1 | 2NT | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round 8 | Connector | 19 | 3♣ | ♥10 | -2 | -9 |
| +1.0 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 1 | 4♠ | ♥J | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 8 | 2♥ | ♠K | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 30 | 2♠ | ♦9 | = | +5 |
| +0.9 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 10 | 1♠ | ♥Q | +1 | +6 |
| +0.7 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 24 | 2♠ | ♣J | +1 | -7 |
| +0.5 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 11 | 4♥ | ♦6 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 14 | 3NT | ♦3 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.3 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 18 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | +6 |
| +0.2 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 17 | 4♥ | ♦K | -1 | +2 |
| +0.1 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 5 | 4♠ | ♠3 | = | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 3 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 8 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 1 | Lazy | 6 | 2♠ | ♦J | = | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 13 | 4♥ | ♥7 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 19 | 4♠ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 16 | 3♦ | ♠6 | -1 | -2 |
| -0.5 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 9 | 3NT | ♣2 | +2 | -17 |
| -0.5 | Round 8 | Connector | 18 | 3NT | ♦8 | -1 | -6 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 14 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | -11 |
| -0.9 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 21 | 2♥ | ♦A | -1 | +2 |
| -1.0 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 5 | 4♠ | ♥10 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 1 | Lazy | 9 | 4♣ | ♠9 | = | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 1 | Lazy | 10 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -1 |
| -1.3 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 15 | 5♦x | ♥8 | -3 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 8 | Connector | 13 | 3NT | ♥5 | +3 | -12 |
| -1.5 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 10 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +1 | -1 |
| -1.7 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 3 | 4♠ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 23 | 1NT | ♠8 | -2 | -2 |
| -2.5 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 12 | 4♥ | ♠7 | = | -1 |
| -2.5 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 6 | 5♣ | ♥A | = | +1 |
| -2.6 | Round 8 | Connector | 12 | 3♥ | ♦K | -1 | -8 |
| -2.8 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 15 | 4♥ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| -3.2 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 4 | 3♠ | ♦4 | -2 | -2 |
| -3.2 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 9 | 4♠x | ♣K | -3 | -4 |
| -4.1 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 16 | 2♠ | ♣8 | -1 | -6 |
| -4.1 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 27 | 7♣ | ♦2 | = | +2 |
| -4.3 | Round 10 | BC’t Onstein 2 | 4 | 2♦ | ♣A | -1 | -5 |
| -4.6 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 19 | 4♥ | ♠10 | -1 | -12 |
| -4.8 | Round 8 | Connector | 17 | 2♦x | ♠10 | -1 | -8 |
| -5.5 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 22 | 3♣x | ♣K | -2 | -12 |
| -5.5 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 29 | 4♠ | ♥Q | -1 | -6 |
| -6.0 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 11 | 6♥ | ♣2 | = | +0 |
| -6.2 | Round 5 | BC’t Onstein 1 | 17 | 3NT | ♠2 | -1 | -10 |
| -6.5 | Round 2 | Zack – Israeli Champion | 20 | 4♥ | ♦6 | +1 | -1 |
| -6.6 | Round 8 | Connector | 20 | 3♠ | ♥4 | +1 | -10 |
| -6.7 | Round 8 | Connector | 15 | 4♥ | ♥3 | -2 | -11 |
| -8.3 | Round 9 | Bareket Team | 28 | 3NTx | ♦4 | -3 | -9 |
| -9.1 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 2 | 6♠ | ♠4 | -1 | -14 |
| -10.6 | Round 7 | Black - Engl. Champion | 7 | 6NT | ♣5 | -2 | -13 |