ZIMMERMANN Pierre · MONACO FMB
vs par split: bidding -1.35 · play +0.68
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.31/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.69/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 72.7% · declarer play 88.9% · defence 86.4%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 70.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (7) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 83.3% (18) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 66.7% (6) · ♣ 66.7% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -3.80 (10) · a suit +0.37 (30)
vs par by level: part-score -0.08 (13) · game -0.96 (27)
By role: declaring -1.05/bd (-3.72 vs par · 18) · defending +0.16/bd (+1.82 vs par · 22)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.93/bd (+0.05 vs par · 20) · not vulnerable +0.15/bd (-1.40 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 7 | F.Multon | M.Klukowski – P.Gawrys | Closed | 10 | -6.4 | -0.64 | +0.30 |
| Round 8 | F.Multon | P.Toffier – D.Pilon | Open | 10 | +1.7 | +0.17 | +0.90 |
| Round 10 | F.Multon | G.Colarossi – R.Severini | Open | 10 | -11.7 | -1.17 | -4.00 |
| Round 11 | F.Multon | K.Karaivanov – R.Trendafilov | Closed | 10 | +1.0 | +0.10 | +0.10 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.5 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 18 | 4♠x | ♦2 | -2 | +10 |
| +7.3 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 18 | 3NT | ♦10 | -2 | +8 |
| +6.5 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 5 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | +8 |
| +5.1 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 5 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| +5.1 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 12 | 1NT | ♠5 | -2 | +3 |
| +3.5 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 6 | 5♦ | ♦2 | -1 | +6 |
| +2.8 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 16 | 3♥ | ♠5 | -2 | +5 |
| +1.9 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 20 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | +12 |
| +1.5 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 11 | 3♠ | ♦2 | +1 | +2 |
| +1.4 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 17 | 2♦ | ♣J | -2 | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 3 | 4♦ | ♦2 | -2 | +2 |
| +0.7 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 6 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | +3 |
| +0.5 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 13 | 3NT | ♦2 | -1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 15 | 5♦x | ♦2 | -2 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 19 | 5♦x | ♦2 | -2 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 12 | 2♠ | ♦2 | -1 | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 7 | 5♣ | ♠J | = | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 14 | 3NT | ♦J | +1 | -11 |
| +0.0 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 10 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -0.0 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 11 | 4♥ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.0 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 15 | 3♥ | ♣6 | -2 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 1 | 4♥ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 14 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -0.5 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 10 | 3♦ | ♠K | +1 | -10 |
| -1.0 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 8 | 3NT | ♠2 | +1 | -11 |
| -1.4 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 13 | 3♦ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| -1.5 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 2 | 5♦ | ♦2 | +1 | -1 |
| -1.6 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 8 | 3NT | ♦2 | +1 | -1 |
| -2.5 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 7 | 3♦ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 17 | 3♠ | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -2.8 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 4 | 3♦ | ♦6 | = | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 20 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -3.1 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 4 | 3NT | ♣8 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 2 | 4♠ | ♣A | +2 | -14 |
| -4.0 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 9 | 5♥ | ♠3 | +1 | -8 |
| -4.1 | Round 8 | ZALESKI FRA | 16 | 5♥ | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -4.1 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 9 | 4♥ | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -4.8 | Round 7 | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 1 | 3♥ | ♦2 | +1 | -2 |
| -5.3 | Round 10 | ASD PESCARA BRIDGE ITA | 3 | 3NT | ♦6 | -3 | -9 |
| -16.2 | Round 11 | TITAN BUL | 19 | 3NTx | ♥J | -5 | -17 |