SAELENSMINDE Erik · ENG-EBU TEAM
vs par split: bidding -0.75 · play +0.12
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.01/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.88/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 71.4% #42 of 59 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 59 · defence 85.7% #25 of 59
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 0.0% (2) | 100.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (5) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 90.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 75.0% (4) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.56 (9) · a suit -0.65 (23)
vs par by level: part-score +0.31 (13) · game -0.14 (14) · slam -4.40 (5)
By role: declaring -1.07/bd (-2.61 vs par · 18) · defending -0.65/bd (+1.93 vs par · 14)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.07/bd (+1.62 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -1.84/bd (-2.88 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | S.Gillis | J.Van Lankveld – B.Van Den Bos | Open | 16 | -3.3 | -0.21 | -1.00 |
| Final | S.Gillis | L.Cima – V.Giubilo | Closed | 16 | -25.0 | -1.56 | -0.25 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.8 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 16 | 7♠ | ♠3 | -1 | +17 |
| +7.7 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 12 | 4♦ | ♦2 | +2 | +1 |
| +6.6 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 1 | 3NT | ♦10 | -3 | +7 |
| +4.1 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 4 | 4♥ | ♣A | -2 | +13 |
| +2.0 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 14 | 1NT | ♦8 | = | +5 |
| +1.7 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 1 | 1NT | ♥6 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 15 | 3♥ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 12 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| +0.6 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 15 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 7 | 3♠ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 11 | 4♠ | ♥K | = | +8 |
| +0.5 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 3 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | +0 |
| +0.5 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 9 | 4♠ | ♥10 | -1 | -2 |
| +0.5 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 11 | 3NT | ♠7 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 10 | 4♥ | ♠J | = | -1 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 2 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | +2 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 14 | 2NT | ♥5 | = | -6 |
| -0.3 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 13 | 2NT | ♠6 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.3 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 10 | 2♥ | ♠4 | +2 | +10 |
| -0.4 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 3 | 4♥ | ♠10 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 13 | 3♦ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 6 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -10 |
| -1.5 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 4 | 2♥ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 8 | 3♦ | ♠Q | +1 | -8 |
| -2.9 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 8 | 4♥ | ♣A | -1 | -4 |
| -3.2 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 5 | 5♠ | ♦3 | = | +0 |
| -5.2 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 9 | 2♥ | ♥9 | = | +0 |
| -6.8 | Semifinal | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 16 | 6♦ | ♥8 | -3 | -15 |
| -9.0 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 6 | 3NT | ♦4 | -2 | -13 |
| -9.5 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 2 | 6♥ | ♦K | -1 | -11 |
| -9.5 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 7 | 6♠ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -14.0 | Final | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 5 | 6♥ | ♦9 | = | -13 |