VERHEES Jr Louk · NED-BC’T ONSTEIN
vs par split: bidding +1.61 · play -1.10
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.38/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.06/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% #53 of 59 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 59 · defence 87.5% #22 of 59
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (2) | 71.4% (7) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (1) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 90.9% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 75.0% (4) · ♣ 66.7% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +3.22 (9) · a suit +0.00 (23)
vs par by level: part-score -1.07 (14) · game +1.20 (15) · slam +8.67 (3)
By role: declaring -1.73/bd (-3.33 vs par · 15) · defending +0.93/bd (+4.65 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.01/bd (+0.25 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -0.62/bd (+1.56 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | R.Van Prooijen | B.Brogeland – E.Lindqvist | Closed | 16 | +12.0 | +0.75 | +0.88 |
| Final | R.Van Prooijen | D.Bilde – G.Duboin | Closed | 16 | -22.1 | -1.38 | +0.94 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.1 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 32 | 6♠ | ♣A | +1 | +13 |
| +5.0 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 29 | 2NT | ♠3 | = | +1 |
| +4.9 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 17 | 3♥ | ♣A | +1 | +7 |
| +4.7 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 25 | 4♥ | ♠5 | -1 | +10 |
| +3.9 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 23 | 3♥ | ♦2 | = | +10 |
| +3.9 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 21 | 3NT | ♦5 | = | +13 |
| +3.5 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 21 | 5♦ | ♦2 | -1 | +10 |
| +2.9 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 18 | 3NT | ♥10 | = | +10 |
| +0.9 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 26 | 2♥ | ♣9 | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 30 | 3♥ | ♥5 | +1 | -6 |
| +0.5 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 23 | 3♦ | ♦5 | -2 | -2 |
| +0.2 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 18 | 6♥ | ♥4 | +1 | +13 |
| +0.2 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 31 | 4♠ | ♣5 | = | +0 |
| +0.1 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 22 | 2♠ | ♦2 | -2 | -5 |
| -0.1 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 19 | 4♠ | ♣2 | -1 | -5 |
| -0.1 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 30 | 3NT | ♥5 | +3 | +11 |
| -0.2 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 32 | 1NT | ♦5 | +1 | -10 |
| -0.4 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 22 | 2♥ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| -0.8 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 17 | 3NT | ♠5 | +3 | +10 |
| -0.8 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 19 | 3NT | ♥5 | +2 | +11 |
| -1.5 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 24 | 3♦ | ♦5 | -1 | +2 |
| -1.5 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 31 | 3♠ | ♣6 | -1 | -5 |
| -1.7 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 20 | 2♥ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -1.8 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 28 | 2♠ | ♦6 | -1 | -2 |
| -1.8 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 27 | 6♣ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| -2.4 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 29 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | -6 |
| -3.4 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 25 | 2♠ | ♣10 | = | -5 |
| -3.4 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 20 | 3NT | ♦5 | +1 | -11 |
| -5.8 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 28 | 4♠ | ♦5 | -1 | +2 |
| -6.5 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 24 | 5♣ | ♦5 | = | -14 |
| -7.8 | Semifinal | ENG-EBU TEAM | 27 | 4♠ | ♦7 | -1 | -11 |
| -9.4 | Final | ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA | 26 | 4♥ | ♥2 | -1 | -12 |