CIMA Leonardo · ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L.
vs par split: bidding -0.06 · play +0.06
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.26/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.51/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% #28 of 59 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 59 · defence 88.9% #15 of 59
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (4) | 50.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (5) |
| Defence | 75.0% (8) | 100.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 75.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +1.20 (10) · a suit -0.55 (22)
vs par by level: part-score -2.50 (8) · game +0.69 (16) · slam +1.12 (8)
By role: declaring -0.53/bd (-4.07 vs par · 14) · defending -0.04/bd (+3.17 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.41/bd (-1.19 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -0.92/bd (+1.19 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | V.Giubilo | S.Gillis – E.Saelensminde | Closed | 16 | +25.0 | +1.56 | +0.25 |
| Final | L.Lauria | E.Lindqvist – B.Brogeland | Open | 16 | -33.1 | -2.07 | -0.25 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +14.0 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 5 | 6♥ | ♦9 | = | +13 |
| +9.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 2 | 6♥ | ♦K | -1 | +11 |
| +9.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 7 | 6♠ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| +9.0 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 6 | 3NT | ♦4 | -2 | +13 |
| +4.9 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 24 | 6♣ | ♥K | = | -11 |
| +2.9 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 8 | 4♥ | ♣A | -1 | +4 |
| +1.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 4 | 2♥ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 18 | 6♥ | ♠3 | = | +13 |
| +0.6 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 13 | 3♦ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| +0.6 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 32 | 1NT | ♥5 | +2 | -10 |
| +0.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 22 | 3♥ | ♦6 | = | +1 |
| +0.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 23 | 3♦ | ♠K | -2 | -2 |
| +0.3 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 10 | 2♥ | ♠4 | +2 | -10 |
| +0.2 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 31 | 4♥ | ♦4 | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 30 | 3NT | ♣2 | +3 | +11 |
| -0.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 3 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 9 | 4♠ | ♥10 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.5 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 11 | 3NT | ♠7 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 15 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -0.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 12 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| -0.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 17 | 3NT | ♦2 | +3 | +10 |
| -0.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 19 | 3NT | ♥4 | +2 | +11 |
| -1.1 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 28 | 3♠ | ♥4 | = | +6 |
| -1.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 27 | 6♣ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 14 | 1NT | ♦8 | = | -5 |
| -4.3 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 20 | 3NT | ♠2 | +2 | -11 |
| -5.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 25 | 4♠ | ♣8 | = | +0 |
| -6.6 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 1 | 3NT | ♦10 | -3 | -7 |
| -7.1 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 29 | 4♠ | ♥10 | -3 | -9 |
| -7.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 21 | 6♦ | ♣J | = | +0 |
| -10.8 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 16 | 7♠ | ♠3 | -1 | -17 |
| -11.0 | Final | ENG-EBU TEAM | 26 | 4♥x | ♣2 | -1 | -13 |