Luis LANTARON · MSV
vs par split: bidding +0.17 · play -0.47
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.09/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.31/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 94.1%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 30.2% (26/86)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 66.7% (3) | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (2) |
| Defence | 100.0% (5) | 91.7% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 50.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -0.78 (9) · a suit -0.10 (21)
vs par by level: part-score -0.38 (16) · game -0.39 (13) · slam +2.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.71/bd (-3.54 vs par · 13) · defending -1.92/bd (+2.18 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.58/bd (-3.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -0.36/bd (+2.19 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Maria SAINZ DE VICUNA | Maggie KNOTTENBELT – Ben HANDLEY-PRITCHARD | Open | 10 | -25.5 | -2.55 | -3.60 |
| Round 2 | Maria SAINZ DE VICUNA | Hatice OZGUR – Mehmet Remzi SAKIRLER | Open | 10 | -19.8 | -1.98 | +1.50 |
| Round 3 | Maria SAINZ DE VICUNA | Edite KLIDZEJA – Martins LORENCS | Open | 10 | +3.4 | +0.34 | +1.20 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.7 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 12 | 2♦ | ♣9 | -3 | +5 |
| +5.0 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 30 | 3NT | ♠J | -1 | +5 |
| +3.6 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 27 | 1NT | ♣T | -2 | +5 |
| +3.3 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 22 | 3♠ | ♥K | = | +1 |
| +2.9 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 29 | 3♣ | ♠A | -1 | +5 |
| +2.8 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 15 | 2♠ | ♦T | +2 | +2 |
| +2.5 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 28 | 2♦ | ♣A | +1 | +5 |
| +2.2 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 23 | 2♠ | ♦A | = | -1 |
| +1.6 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 2 | 5♣ | ♠A | = | +2 |
| +1.5 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 1 | 4♦ | ♠K | -1 | -4 |
| +0.7 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 3 | 3NT | ♠2 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.7 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 17 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -2 | -5 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 24 | 4♠ | ♥4 | = | +1 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 18 | 3♠ | ♥2 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.3 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 5 | 3♠ | ♣K | +1 | -10 |
| -1.2 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 6 | 4♥ | ♣4 | +1 | +13 |
| -1.7 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 13 | 2♠ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 14 | 3NT | ♠3 | +2 | +11 |
| -2.2 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 26 | 3NT | ♠J | = | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 7 | 1NT | ♥3 | +1 | -10 |
| -3.5 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 4 | 2NT | ♠3 | -2 | -7 |
| -3.5 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 16 | 3NT | ♣4 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.8 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 21 | 2♥ | ♦T | +1 | +0 |
| -4.0 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 8 | 5♠ | ♦3 | = | -8 |
| -6.3 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 20 | 3NT | ♦J | -1 | -12 |
| -7.2 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 19 | 3♦x | ♠7 | = | +10 |
| -7.9 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 10 | 4♥ | ♦A | -2 | -13 |
| -8.4 | Round 2 | CEYCEY | 11 | 6♣ | ♦K | = | +2 |
| -9.6 | Round 1 | SUSHI BELT | 9 | 4♠ | ♥T | = | +0 |
| -10.7 | Round 3 | LATVIA | 25 | 3♠x | ♥5 | = | -9 |