SVENDSEN Jan Petter · PONDUS AND BLONDES
vs par split: bidding +0.70 · play -2.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +1.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.08/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 33.3% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 50.0% (2) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (2) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.33 (3) · a suit -2.00 (7)
vs par by level: part-score +3.00 (3) · game -4.80 (5) · slam +1.00 (2)
By role: declaring -3.53/bd (-8.33 vs par · 6) · defending +2.52/bd (+9.25 vs par · 4)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.04/bd (-0.80 vs par · 5) · not vulnerable -2.18/bd (-1.80 vs par · 5)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | G.Brekka | R.Van Prooijen – A.Wilson | Closed | 10 | -11.1 | -1.11 | -1.30 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.8 | Round 1 | WILSON | 6 | 6♣ | ♦6 | -1 | +16 |
| +3.9 | Round 1 | WILSON | 2 | 3NT | ♠A | -2 | +11 |
| +0.7 | Round 1 | WILSON | 5 | 3♣ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 1 | WILSON | 10 | 4♠ | ♣5 | +2 | -13 |
| -0.1 | Round 1 | WILSON | 8 | 3♣ | ♥5 | = | -1 |
| -1.2 | Round 1 | WILSON | 1 | 3NT | ♠J | +2 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 1 | WILSON | 4 | 3♥ | ♣J | +2 | +10 |
| -3.8 | Round 1 | WILSON | 7 | 4♥ | ♠8 | -1 | -12 |
| -8.0 | Round 1 | WILSON | 9 | 3NT | ♠8 | -1 | -10 |
| -10.4 | Round 1 | WILSON | 3 | 6♥ | ♠5 | -1 | -14 |