OLANSKI Wojtek · VITAS
vs par split: bidding +1.50 · play +0.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.63/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.60/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% · defence 75.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 85.7% (7) |
| Defence | 0.0% (1) | 81.8% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 50.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +6.00 (1) · a suit +1.92 (13)
vs par by level: part-score +1.50 (6) · game +3.14 (7) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring +0.10/bd (+1.50 vs par · 2) · defending -0.05/bd (+2.33 vs par · 12)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.59/bd (+1.14 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +0.53/bd (+3.29 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 16 | V.Vainikonis | R.Zaleski – B.Garozzo | Open | 14 | -0.4 | -0.03 | +2.21 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.5 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 6 | 4♦ | ♣7 | +1 | +10 |
| +5.4 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 1 | 4♥ | ♦8 | -1 | +10 |
| +3.0 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 7 | 2♦ | ♥2 | +3 | +0 |
| +2.9 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 4 | 3♣ | ♦Q | -3 | -7 |
| +0.3 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 8 | 4♠ | ♠10 | = | +3 |
| -0.1 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 13 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 14 | 4♥ | ♠J | = | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 12 | 4♥ | ♥10 | +3 | +10 |
| -2.1 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 11 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 9 | 4♥ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 5 | 1NT | ♥2 | +3 | +6 |
| -2.7 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 10 | 5♥ | ♠6 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.6 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 2 | 6♠x | ♦K | -4 | +0 |
| -3.8 | Round of 16 | BRENO | 3 | 3♦ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |