LU Dong · BEIJING TRINERGY
vs par split: bidding -0.73 · play -0.77
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.80/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 66.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 66.7% (3) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 60.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -2.36 (11) · a suit -1.00 (19)
vs par by level: part-score -1.93 (14) · game -2.50 (14) · slam +8.50 (2)
By role: declaring -2.52/bd (-5.47 vs par · 15) · defending +0.53/bd (+2.47 vs par · 15)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.73/bd (-3.47 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -0.27/bd (+0.47 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Y.Wang | J.Berg – P.Austberg | Open | 10 | -33.7 | -3.37 | -3.30 |
| Round 3 | Y.Wang | P.Tondel – O.Svendsen | Closed | 10 | -18.9 | -1.89 | -3.70 |
| Round 6 | Y.Wang | W.Klapper – R.Sakowicz | Closed | 10 | +22.7 | +2.27 | +2.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.3 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 28 | 6♦ | ♣2 | -1 | +17 |
| +8.0 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 24 | 4♥x | ♠A | -4 | +8 |
| +5.6 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 25 | 3NT | ♦4 | -2 | +8 |
| +4.8 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 26 | 1NT | ♦3 | -2 | +7 |
| +1.7 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 21 | 4♥ | ♦A | -1 | +5 |
| +1.6 | Round 1 | ABAX | 10 | 1NT | ♦3 | = | -1 |
| +1.5 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 30 | 6NT | ♠Q | = | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 1 | ABAX | 3 | 2♥ | ♣6 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 30 | 4♥ | ♥J | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 22 | 3NT | ♥K | -1 | +5 |
| +0.8 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 28 | 2♥ | ♦A | -1 | -2 |
| +0.5 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 22 | 3NT | ♠4 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.2 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 21 | 1♠ | ♦3 | = | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 25 | 4♥ | ♣Q | = | -1 |
| -0.4 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 24 | 1NT | ♦Q | = | +1 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | ABAX | 7 | 3♥ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 1 | ABAX | 9 | 4♣ | ♠9 | +1 | +10 |
| -1.6 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 29 | 2♥ | ♣Q | +2 | -10 |
| -2.1 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 27 | 5♣ | ♣3 | -1 | -10 |
| -2.4 | Round 1 | ABAX | 8 | 1NT | ♦4 | +2 | -6 |
| -2.8 | Round 1 | ABAX | 4 | 3♣ | ♠6 | +1 | -7 |
| -3.1 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 27 | 3♠ | ♣4 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.8 | Round 1 | ABAX | 1 | 4♥ | ♣3 | = | -1 |
| -4.7 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 29 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | -6 |
| -5.0 | Round 6 | MPE LATTERIA TINIS | 23 | 2♣ | ♠7 | +1 | -6 |
| -5.7 | Round 1 | ABAX | 2 | 3NT | ♥4 | +2 | -16 |
| -6.5 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 26 | 3NT | ♥7 | -2 | -13 |
| -9.4 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 23 | 3NT | ♥6 | -1 | -12 |
| -9.5 | Round 1 | ABAX | 6 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | -3 |
| -9.9 | Round 1 | ABAX | 5 | 2♦x | ♣8 | -2 | -9 |