BALDYSZ Cathy · POLAND LADIES
291rank
-18.3Butler · 20 bds
-0.92per board
±4.8swing
-0.63adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.29/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.63/bd
By role: declaring -0.32/bd (13) · defending -2.03/bd (7)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable -0.92/bd (20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | A.Sarniak | C.D'Ovidio – J.Seamon-Molson | Open | 10 | -22.7 | -2.27 | · |
| Round 3 | A.Sarniak | R.Vardar – E.Cuhadar | Closed | 10 | +4.4 | +0.44 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.1 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 26 | 2♠x | ♣2 | -3 | · |
| +6.8 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 10 | 4♥ | ♣K | +3 | · |
| +3.2 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 30 | 4♠ | ♥2 | +2 | · |
| +2.8 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 24 | 4♥ | ♠5 | +2 | · |
| +2.5 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 28 | 6♥ | ♦5 | +1 | · |
| +2.4 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 27 | 6♥ | ♣A | = | · |
| +2.1 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 9 | 2♥ | ♠Q | = | · |
| +2.0 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 22 | 3♠ | ♠2 | = | · |
| +0.3 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 21 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +1 | · |
| +0.3 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 23 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | · |
| +0.1 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 1 | 3NT | ♥Q | +1 | · |
| -0.2 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 5 | 3NT | ♦Q | = | · |
| -1.7 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 2 | 4♥ | ♣K | = | · |
| -3.4 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 4 | 4♠ | ♥8 | +1 | · |
| -4.9 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 25 | 5♥ | ♣2 | -2 | · |
| -5.3 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 3 | 4♠ | ♥4 | -2 | · |
| -6.1 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 7 | 3NT | ♥8 | -1 | · |
| -7.4 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 6 | 4♠x | ♥3 | -2 | · |
| -7.6 | Round 1 | D OVIDIO | 8 | 4♠ | ♣5 | = | · |
| -11.3 | Round 3 | ALFA ROMEO | 29 | 6♠ | ♦2 | = | · |