SMITH Nicola · BAKER
7rank
+32.0Butler · 20 bds
+1.60per board
±4.2swing
+1.32adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.28/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.32/bd
By role: declaring +1.75/bd (11) · defending +1.42/bd (9)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable +1.60/bd (20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | S.Brock | K.Ruiter – W.Floris | Closed | 10 | +23.1 | +2.31 | · |
| Round 2 | S.Brock | M.Milaszewski – S.Szenberg | Closed | 10 | +8.9 | +0.89 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.0 | Round 1 | WORM | 3 | 4♠x | ♠Q | -2 | · |
| +8.4 | Round 1 | WORM | 8 | 4♠ | ♠9 | +1 | · |
| +6.3 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 19 | 4♥ | ♥9 | +2 | · |
| +6.1 | Round 1 | WORM | 10 | 6♥ | ♣K | +1 | · |
| +4.5 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 13 | 2♥ | ♠A | +1 | · |
| +3.4 | Round 1 | WORM | 4 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | · |
| +3.4 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 16 | 1NT | ♠3 | -1 | · |
| +3.2 | Round 1 | WORM | 9 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -2 | · |
| +2.6 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 17 | 5♣x | ♣8 | -1 | · |
| +1.8 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 11 | 1NT | ♦K | +2 | · |
| +1.7 | Round 1 | WORM | 2 | 4♥ | ♣K | = | · |
| +1.2 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 18 | 4♥x | ♣K | -1 | · |
| +0.9 | Round 1 | WORM | 1 | 3NT | ♣6 | = | · |
| +0.2 | Round 1 | WORM | 5 | 3NT | ♦Q | = | · |
| -0.2 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 14 | 3♦ | ♣Q | = | · |
| -0.7 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 15 | 5♣x | ♦7 | -2 | · |
| -3.2 | Round 1 | WORM | 6 | 3NT | ♠J | -2 | · |
| -4.1 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 20 | 5♦ | ♦8 | -1 | · |
| -5.9 | Round 2 | SZENBERG | 12 | 2♠ | ♦6 | +3 | · |
| -6.6 | Round 1 | WORM | 7 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | · |