VARDAR Rifat · ALFA ROMEO
296rank
-46.8Butler · 50 bds
-0.94per board
±4.6swing
-1.09adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.16/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.09/bd
By role: declaring -0.29/bd (22) · defending -1.44/bd (28)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable -0.94/bd (50)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | E.Cuhadar | S.Froeyland – J.Herland | Closed | 10 | -26.6 | -2.66 | · |
| Round 2 | E.Cuhadar | D.Gold – M.Robertson | Closed | 10 | -11.0 | -1.10 | · |
| Round 3 | E.Cuhadar | A.Sarniak – C.Baldysz | Closed | 10 | -4.4 | -0.44 | · |
| Round 4 | E.Cuhadar | H.Van Ipenburg – M.Kaptein | Closed | 10 | -12.2 | -1.22 | · |
| Round 5 | E.Cuhadar | P.Louchart – J.Naessens | Closed | 10 | +7.4 | +0.74 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.3 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 29 | 6♠ | ♦2 | = | · |
| +8.9 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 11 | 6♠ | ♥7 | = | · |
| +7.1 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 19 | 1NT | ♥5 | = | · |
| +4.9 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 25 | 5♥ | ♣2 | -2 | · |
| +3.4 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 4 | 5♠ | ♥A | = | · |
| +3.3 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 3 | 3♦ | ♥6 | = | · |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 1 | 3♦ | ♠A | +2 | · |
| +3.1 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 8 | 2♠ | ♥A | = | · |
| +3.1 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 15 | 2♥ | ♦2 | = | · |
| +2.8 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 9 | 2♠ | ♦Q | -1 | · |
| +2.6 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 19 | 2♥ | ♦3 | -1 | · |
| +2.2 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 12 | 2♥ | ♣K | = | · |
| +2.0 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 8 | 3♠ | ♣4 | = | · |
| +1.8 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 7 | 3♦ | ♦4 | +1 | · |
| +1.7 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 2 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | · |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 17 | 4♠ | ♥5 | = | · |
| +1.0 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 16 | 2♦ | ♠6 | = | · |
| +0.6 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 14 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +2 | · |
| +0.2 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 14 | 2♦ | ♣Q | +1 | · |
| -0.1 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 1 | 3NT | ♣2 | +1 | · |
| -0.2 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 18 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | · |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 17 | A♦J | ♣K | · | |
| -0.3 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 21 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +1 | · |
| -0.3 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 23 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | · |
| -0.4 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 6 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | · |
| -0.8 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 2 | 2♠ | ♥K | +2 | · |
| -1.2 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 18 | 1♠ | ♥5 | +1 | · |
| -1.4 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 20 | 2♠ | ♥Q | +1 | · |
| -1.5 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 16 | 2♥x | ♠2 | -1 | · |
| -1.8 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 20 | 3♠ | ♦K | = | · |
| -2.0 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 22 | 3♠ | ♠2 | = | · |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 4 | 3♣ | ♣A | -1 | · |
| -2.4 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 27 | 6♥ | ♣A | = | · |
| -2.5 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 28 | 6♥ | ♦5 | +1 | · |
| -2.8 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 24 | 4♥ | ♠5 | +2 | · |
| -3.0 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 11 | 2NT | ♦7 | -4 | · |
| -3.0 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 12 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | · |
| -3.1 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 9 | 3♥ | ♠2 | = | · |
| -3.2 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 30 | 4♠ | ♥2 | +2 | · |
| -3.2 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 5 | 6♠ | ♦4 | +1 | · |
| -4.5 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 13 | 2♥ | ♠3 | +1 | · |
| -5.8 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 5 | 2♠ | ♥10 | +2 | · |
| -5.9 | Round 2 | ROBERTSON | 15 | 5♥ | ♣4 | = | · |
| -6.3 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 10 | 4NT | ♦J | +3 | · |
| -6.4 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 3 | 4♥x | ♠A | -2 | · |
| -7.1 | Round 3 | POLAND LADIES | 26 | 2♠x | ♣2 | -3 | · |
| -7.2 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 10 | 4♣ | ♠A | -4 | · |
| -8.1 | Round 5 | NAESSENS | 13 | 4♣ | ♠2 | -3 | · |
| -11.0 | Round 4 | KERDIZO | 7 | 4♥ | ♦5 | = | · |
| -13.8 | Round 1 | STOKKEN | 6 | 5♣xx | ♦7 | -2 | · |