LESKOVAR Viktor · CROATIA II
vs par split: bidding -0.57 · play -0.79
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.16/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.31/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 71.4%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 40.3% (29/72)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | · | 66.7% (3) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 66.7% (3) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -0.08 (12) · a suit -0.94 (16)
vs par by level: part-score -0.15 (13) · game -1.14 (14) · slam +2.00 (1)
By role: declaring -1.81/bd (-3.13 vs par · 15) · defending -1.08/bd (+2.38 vs par · 13)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.06/bd (-0.07 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -1.89/bd (-1.07 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | M.Ferenca | F.Volcker – L.Sebbane | Open | 14 | -20.2 | -1.44 | +0.21 |
| Round of 64 | M.Ferenca | I.Baroni – G.Laffineur | Closed | 14 | -21.0 | -1.50 | -1.36 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.6 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 40 | 3NTx | ♠A | -2 | +4 |
| +3.6 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 33 | 4♠ | ♦J | +1 | +0 |
| +3.3 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 26 | 1NT | = | +5 | |
| +3.2 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 22 | 5♥ | +1 | +5 | |
| +2.4 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 19 | 3♦ | -1 | +5 | |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 24 | 3NT | -3 | +6 | |
| +2.1 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 37 | 2♠ | ♣J | = | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 29 | 1NT | ♠J | = | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 35 | 4♥ | ♣Q | -2 | +8 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 20 | 2♠ | = | -1 | |
| +0.4 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 27 | 1NT | = | -2 | |
| +0.3 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 18 | 4♠ | = | +0 | |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 38 | 3♦ | ♠6 | = | -1 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 23 | 3♦ | -1 | +1 | |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 31 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | +2 |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 36 | 1NT | ♥5 | -2 | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 39 | 3NT | ♣9 | +1 | +1 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 21 | 3♥ | = | +0 | |
| -1.9 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 32 | 2♠ | ♥J | +1 | -1 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 42 | 3♣x | ♥3 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.7 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 16 | 3♠ | -2 | -2 | |
| -3.6 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 15 | 3NT | +1 | +12 | |
| -7.5 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 34 | 3NT | ♠J | -3 | -11 |
| -8.0 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 17 | 3NT | = | -7 | |
| -8.2 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 28 | 3NT | -1 | -10 | |
| -9.1 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 25 | 4♥x | -2 | -9 | |
| -10.1 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 30 | 6♦ | ♠K | = | +2 |
| -12.2 | Round of 64 | LATINS | 41 | 5♦ | ♥J | +2 | -17 |