ELLINGSEN Stig · 9 LIV
389rank
-26.5Butler · 10 bds
-2.65per board
±6.2swing
-3.70vs par /bd
-2.18adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding -2.00 · play -1.70
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.47/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -2.18/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 66.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 75.0% (4) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -3.67 (3) · a suit -3.71 (7)
vs par by level: part-score -0.67 (6) · game -11.00 (3) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.17/bd (-3.25 vs par · 4) · defending -4.30/bd (-4.00 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -3.00/bd (-5.50 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable -2.42/bd (-2.50 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | T.Selfors | K.Helmersen – A.Haaland | Closed | 10 | -26.5 | -2.65 | -3.70 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.5 | Round 5 | HELMER | 15 | 6♠ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 5 | HELMER | 12 | 2♠ | ♥9 | +1 | +10 |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | HELMER | 20 | 3NT | ♠Q | +1 | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 5 | HELMER | 17 | 2NT | ♠7 | = | +7 |
| +0.9 | Round 5 | HELMER | 19 | 2♥ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -3.1 | Round 5 | HELMER | 16 | 3♠ | ♣9 | -2 | -7 |
| -3.5 | Round 5 | HELMER | 14 | 2♠ | ♥A | -1 | -8 |
| -5.7 | Round 5 | HELMER | 18 | 3♥ | ♥8 | +2 | -6 |
| -11.4 | Round 5 | HELMER | 13 | 4♥ | ♥A | = | -15 |
| -15.0 | Round 5 | HELMER | 11 | 3NT | ♦8 | = | -18 |