VAINIKONIS Vytautas · VYTAS
vs par split: bidding -0.10 · play -0.10
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.41/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 77.8% · declarer play 81.8% · defence 92.9%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 75.0% (8) |
| Declarer play | 83.3% (6) | 80.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (5) | 88.9% (9) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 83.3% (6) · ♣ 50.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +2.08 (12) · a suit -1.72 (18)
vs par by level: part-score -0.08 (13) · game +0.31 (16) · slam -10.00 (1)
By role: declaring +0.84/bd (-1.06 vs par · 16) · defending -0.49/bd (+0.79 vs par · 14)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.45/bd (-0.12 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -0.04/bd (-0.29 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 6 | A.Gulevich | S.Cope – M.Robertson | Closed | 10 | -6.7 | -0.67 | -0.90 |
| Round 7 | A.Gulevich | D.Lu – Y.Huang | Open | 10 | +11.2 | +1.12 | +0.20 |
| Round 8 | A.Gulevich | L.Berkowitz – D.Berkowitz | Open | 10 | +2.2 | +0.22 | +0.10 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.9 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 27 | 3NT | ♦Q | = | +7 |
| +5.6 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 20 | 4♥ | ♦10 | = | +3 |
| +4.4 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 21 | 4♥ | ♣7 | -2 | +7 |
| +3.7 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 7 | 1NT | ♠5 | -2 | +3 |
| +3.6 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 24 | 3♥ | ♠4 | +1 | +7 |
| +3.5 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 11 | 3NT | ♣A | -1 | +10 |
| +3.4 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 8 | 3NT | ♠9 | +2 | +1 |
| +3.1 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 23 | 4♥ | ♣7 | +2 | +1 |
| +2.1 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 15 | 2♠ | ♦4 | -1 | +1 |
| +2.0 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 25 | 1NT | ♦5 | +1 | +7 |
| +2.0 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 10 | 3NT | ♥3 | +1 | -1 |
| +1.7 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 3 | 3♥ | ♣Q | -3 | +1 |
| +1.4 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 19 | 4♠ | ♣2 | -2 | -5 |
| +1.1 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 4 | 1NT | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 5 | 4♥ | ♦A | +2 | -11 |
| +0.9 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 3NT | ♠A | +2 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 17 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +11 |
| -0.1 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 1 | 3♣ | ♦3 | +1 | +7 |
| -1.1 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 9 | 3NT | ♥Q | -3 | +3 |
| -1.1 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 12 | 3♦ | ♦3 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 14 | 3NT | ♣10 | -2 | -5 |
| -1.5 | Round 7 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 6 | 1♥ | ♦6 | +3 | -1 |
| -1.5 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 18 | 4♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 22 | 4♠x | ♥9 | -1 | -5 |
| -1.7 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 26 | 2♠ | ♦10 | = | -6 |
| -1.8 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 13 | 2♦x | ♥3 | -1 | -3 |
| -3.8 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 29 | 2♠ | ♥Q | -1 | -5 |
| -5.2 | Round 8 | SANBORN | 16 | 3NT | ♦J | = | -11 |
| -9.6 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 28 | 6♦ | ♣2 | -1 | -10 |
| -10.0 | Round 6 | ROBERTSON | 30 | 2♠x | ♣K | = | -12 |