KARADENIZ Mesut · TURKIYE SENIORS
vs par split: bidding -1.32 · play +0.07
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.12/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.44/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 93.3% #13 of 268 · declarer play 64.7% #178 of 268 · defence 92.3% #31 of 268
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 91.7% (12) |
| Declarer play | 80.0% (5) | 58.3% (12) |
| Defence | 100.0% (5) | 90.5% (21) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 80.0% (5) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT +0.21 (14) · a suit -1.70 (46)
vs par by level: part-score -0.48 (21) · game -1.24 (34) · slam -4.60 (5)
By role: declaring -1.21/bd (-4.26 vs par · 34) · defending +0.28/bd (+2.69 vs par · 26)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.43/bd (-0.73 vs par · 30) · not vulnerable -0.70/bd (-1.77 vs par · 30)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | A.Musaoglu | W.Lazer – P.Gumby | Open | 12 | +9.3 | +0.78 | +0.58 |
| Round 2 | A.Musaoglu | G.Chagas – C.Pellegrini | Closed | 12 | -17.8 | -1.48 | -2.58 |
| Round 3 | A.Musaoglu | S.Baldysz – C.Baldysz | Closed | 12 | -2.4 | -0.20 | -1.42 |
| Round 4 | A.Musaoglu | C.Teodorescu – I.Bacalu | Open | 12 | +1.7 | +0.14 | +0.42 |
| Round 5 | A.Musaoglu | Y.Lian – Y.Cai | Closed | 12 | -24.6 | -2.05 | -3.25 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.4 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 19 | 3NT | ♠9 | -3 | +16 |
| +5.4 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 20 | 2♥ | ♣Q | -1 | +6 |
| +4.6 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 7 | 1NT | ♠A | -3 | +4 |
| +4.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 15 | 5♥x | ♦A | -2 | -5 |
| +3.3 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 12 | 5♦ | ♠9 | +2 | +14 |
| +3.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 17 | 4♠ | ♥Q | -3 | +2 |
| +2.9 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 11 | 4♥ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| +2.7 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 13 | 3♠ | ♦10 | +1 | +10 |
| +2.6 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 2 | 1NT | ♣Q | -4 | +8 |
| +2.5 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 13 | 4♠ | ♥2 | +2 | +1 |
| +2.3 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 8 | 5♦ | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| +2.2 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 16 | 3NT | ♠7 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.9 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 21 | 5♥ | ♥K | +1 | -11 |
| +1.7 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 3 | 3NT | ♥6 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 3 | 2♥ | ♦K | = | +6 |
| +1.4 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 14 | 5♦x | ♠3 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.3 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 6 | 6♥ | ♠A | -1 | +11 |
| +1.2 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 5 | 3NT | ♠5 | +1 | -1 |
| +1.2 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 4 | 2♠ | ♥5 | +3 | -10 |
| +1.1 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 1 | 3NT | ♠9 | +2 | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 2 | 2♠ | ♣J | +1 | +6 |
| +0.9 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 8 | 3♣ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 9 | 3♦ | ♣K | -1 | -3 |
| +0.9 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 12 | 4♠ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 18 | 4♠ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 12 | 4♥ | ♦9 | -1 | -5 |
| +0.5 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 14 | 3♠ | ♦A | = | -7 |
| +0.3 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 4 | 2♥ | ♥3 | +1 | +10 |
| +0.3 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 10 | 3♦ | ♥J | +1 | -10 |
| +0.1 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 6 | 5♦ | ♠10 | = | -11 |
| +0.1 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 10 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 10 | 3♦ | ♣9 | -2 | -2 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 9 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | -1 |
| -0.2 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 17 | 3NT | ♥K | -1 | +6 |
| -0.2 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 22 | 4♥ | ♣6 | = | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 5 | 5♠ | ♣4 | +1 | -9 |
| -0.5 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 2 | 3♥ | ♠A | = | +6 |
| -0.5 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 9 | 2♣ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 20 | 3NT | ♠9 | +1 | +12 |
| -1.4 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 7 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | -1 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 5 | 5♦ | ♠A | -2 | -11 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 21 | 2♠ | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 22 | 6♠x | ♣K | -1 | +5 |
| -2.1 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 24 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | +1 |
| -2.1 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 11 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | +0 |
| -2.4 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 11 | 4♠ | ♦K | -2 | -5 |
| -2.5 | Round 1 | SYDNEY SWINGERS | 7 | 2NT | ♠2 | +2 | -10 |
| -2.5 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 4 | 2♠ | ♦A | -1 | -5 |
| -2.6 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 1 | 3NT | ♣2 | = | +1 |
| -2.7 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 16 | 2♥ | ♦A | +1 | -1 |
| -2.7 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 6 | 5♠x | ♣3 | = | -5 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 24 | 3NT | ♣10 | -1 | -10 |
| -4.3 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 23 | 6♣ | ♥9 | = | -13 |
| -5.6 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 19 | 2NT | ♦K | +3 | -10 |
| -6.4 | Round 3 | POLAND WOMEN | 3 | 5♦ | ♠K | = | -5 |
| -7.2 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 23 | 6♠ | ♣A | = | -12 |
| -7.7 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 18 | 2♦x | ♣J | -3 | -8 |
| -8.0 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 1 | 4♠ | ♣2 | -1 | -8 |
| -13.0 | Round 5 | CHINA OPEN | 8 | 6NTx | ♠7 | -4 | -14 |
| -13.8 | Round 2 | CHAGAS | 15 | 4♥x | ♦4 | -5 | -14 |