SO Ho-Yee · CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN
vs par split: bidding +2.00 · play -0.88
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.18/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.48/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 25.0% · defence 84.6%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 33.3% (3) |
| Defence | 33.3% (3) | 100.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.00 (5) · a suit +1.68 (19)
vs par by level: part-score +5.50 (4) · game +1.28 (18) · slam -9.00 (2)
By role: declaring +0.13/bd (-1.36 vs par · 11) · defending -0.67/bd (+3.23 vs par · 13)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.46/bd (+0.75 vs par · 12) · not vulnerable +0.85/bd (+1.50 vs par · 12)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Y.Hung | T.Di Febo – L.Vecchi | Open | 12 | -7.0 | -0.58 | +1.92 |
| Round 2 | Y.Hung | A.Jarosz – A.Zareba | Open | 12 | -0.3 | -0.02 | +0.33 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.1 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 13 | 5♠x | ♣K | -3 | +14 |
| +8.6 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 17 | 1♠ | ♥7 | = | +11 |
| +4.7 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 2 | 4♠ | ♣7 | -1 | +10 |
| +3.0 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 8 | 4♠ | ♠5 | -1 | +6 |
| +2.6 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 14 | 4♠ | ♦5 | -3 | +6 |
| +2.0 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 6 | 4♥ | ♦A | -1 | +2 |
| +2.0 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 7 | 3NT | ♣3 | = | -1 |
| +1.9 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 18 | 1NT | ♦2 | = | +5 |
| +1.6 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 16 | 4♦ | ♠K | -1 | +5 |
| +1.1 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 22 | 3♠ | ♥K | +1 | +1 |
| +0.8 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 24 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +2 | -11 |
| +0.6 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 1 | 4♥ | ♣8 | -1 | -4 |
| -0.4 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 19 | 5♠ | ♥3 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.6 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 9 | 4♠ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| -0.8 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 23 | 5♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 10 | 4♠ | ♦4 | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 4 | 4♥ | ♥7 | +2 | +13 |
| -2.1 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 12 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -6 |
| -2.7 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 11 | 4♥ | ♦7 | +1 | +0 |
| -4.3 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 21 | 3NT | ♦A | = | +1 |
| -4.8 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 5 | 6♦ | ♣2 | = | +2 |
| -6.4 | Round 1 | ITALIAN SENIORS | 3 | 3NT | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -8.4 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 20 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | -10 |
| -16.1 | Round 2 | POLAND WOMEN | 15 | 7♦ | ♥5 | -1 | -20 |