OVERDECK John · OVERDECK

46rank
-6.2Butler · 16 bds
-0.39per board
±4.0swing
+1.25vs par /bd
+0.21adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding +1.62 · play -0.38

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.60/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.21/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 0.0% · defence 83.3%

Bidding activity — not a pass: 45.2% (19/42)

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·100.0% (2)
Declarer play·0.0% (2)
Defence100.0% (1)80.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (4) · a suit +1.67 (12)

vs par by level: part-score -3.00 (5) · game +3.18 (11)

By role: declaring +0.87/bd (+0.40 vs par · 10) · defending -2.48/bd (+2.67 vs par · 6)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.64/bd (+3.25 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -2.41/bd (-0.75 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round of 16A.GerliZ.Marcinski – M.LorberClosed16-6.2-0.39+1.25

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+7.7Round of 16CANUCKS64♠♥K=+13
+4.4Round of 16CANUCKS102NT♠4+1+1
+3.1Round of 16CANUCKS95♦♥2+2+11
+2.3Round of 16CANUCKS44♠♥Q=+3
+1.6Round of 16CANUCKS54♠♣Q+2+9
+0.9Round of 16CANUCKS134♥♥2-1+0
+0.8Round of 16CANUCKS31♠♦Q=-9
+0.1Round of 16CANUCKS84♦♣T-2+5
-0.0Round of 16CANUCKS154♥♠A+1+0
-0.1Round of 16CANUCKS124♥♠5=+0
-0.2Round of 16CANUCKS163NT♠8=+7
-2.9Round of 16CANUCKS113♦♥7-2-11
-3.4Round of 16CANUCKS143NT♣2-1-5
-5.9Round of 16CANUCKS13NT♥Q=-3
-5.9Round of 16CANUCKS74♥♦2=+0
-8.7Round of 16CANUCKS23♠♣A-1-1