WANG Liping · GEELY AUTOMOBILE
vs par split: bidding -0.75 · play +0.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.75/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.25/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 75.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 48.0% (12/25)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 66.7% (3) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +1.67 (3) · a suit -2.20 (5)
vs par by level: part-score -1.33 (3) · game -0.40 (5)
By role: declaring +1.90/bd (-2.00 vs par · 4) · defending +0.10/bd (+0.50 vs par · 4)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.85/bd (-2.50 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable +1.15/bd (+1.00 vs par · 4)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | W.Wang | P.Zatorski – K.Dufrat | Open | 8 | +8.0 | +1.00 | -0.75 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.