MATKOWSKI Piotr · MESCO BYTOM
vs par split: bidding -1.64 · play -0.55
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.19/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.05/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 75.0% · defence 66.7%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 45.5% (15/33)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | · |
| Declarer play | · | 75.0% (4) |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (1) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.67 (3) · a suit -2.75 (8)
vs par by level: part-score -3.40 (5) · game +0.80 (5) · slam -11.00 (1)
By role: declaring +0.04/bd (-3.50 vs par · 8) · defending +0.80/bd (+1.33 vs par · 3)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.26/bd (-3.00 vs par · 5) · not vulnerable +0.23/bd (-1.50 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | K.Sliwon | R.Katz – N.Nickell | Open | 11 | +2.7 | +0.25 | -2.18 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.9 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 20 | 5♥ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| +3.7 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 19 | 5♣ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| +3.7 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 21 | 4♥ | ♥4 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.9 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 24 | 1NT | ♠2 | -1 | +4 |
| +1.1 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 16 | 2♥ | ♣A | = | +5 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 25 | 4♥ | ♠4 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 15 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | -1 |
| -2.6 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 22 | 6♣ | ♦2 | +1 | -11 |
| -3.0 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 17 | 3♦ | ♣K | +2 | -7 |
| -3.2 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 18 | 1NT | ♦A | = | -5 |
| -6.8 | Round 2 | NICKELL | 23 | 3♦ | ♥4 | +1 | -14 |