NARKIEWICZ Grzegorz · SPS KIELCE POLAND
vs par split: bidding +0.39 · play -0.07
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.87/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.68/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 78.6%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 40.5% (32/79)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (3) |
| Defence | 66.7% (3) | 81.8% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 50.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +0.88 (8) · a suit +0.10 (20)
vs par by level: part-score -5.75 (8) · game +1.25 (16) · slam +8.75 (4)
By role: declaring -0.89/bd (-1.71 vs par · 14) · defending +1.26/bd (+2.36 vs par · 14)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.91/bd (-0.29 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -0.53/bd (+0.93 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | G.Glasek | N.Hammelev – E.Wood | Closed | 14 | -10.2 | -0.73 | +1.14 |
| Round of 64 | G.Glasek | E.Wood – N.Hammelev | Closed | 14 | +15.5 | +1.11 | -0.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.4 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 27 | 6♠ | ♣9 | -1 | +10 |
| +10.0 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 13 | 4♥x | ♠8 | -3 | +14 |
| +6.8 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 11 | 6♥ | ♣A | -1 | +10 |
| +6.2 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 20 | 3♥ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| +4.6 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 9 | 3NT | ♣3 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.5 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 28 | 3NT | ♣6 | +1 | +0 |
| +4.0 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 17 | 6♠ | ♥3 | -1 | +4 |
| +2.6 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 18 | 4♠ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 7 | 3NT | ♥8 | +2 | +4 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 19 | 3NT | ♣A | = | +0 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 14 | 6♠ | ♥4 | +1 | +11 |
| +0.9 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 16 | 4♥ | ♦4 | = | +1 |
| +0.5 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 26 | 4♠ | ♥T | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 2 | 4♠ | ♣Q | = | +11 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 22 | 4♠ | ♥T | = | +3 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 10 | 4♥ | ♦3 | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 6 | 1♠ | ♠J | -1 | -11 |
| -0.7 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 23 | 3♦ | ♥6 | +2 | -10 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 21 | 2♠ | ♥2 | +2 | -2 |
| -2.8 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 1 | 3♦ | ♥6 | -1 | -10 |
| -3.0 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 4 | 3NT | ♥J | +1 | -1 |
| -3.3 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 15 | 2NT | ♥3 | -2 | +1 |
| -3.3 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 25 | 3♥ | ♠2 | = | -6 |
| -5.6 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 8 | 4♥ | ♦9 | -1 | -8 |
| -6.2 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 12 | 4♠ | ♦2 | -2 | -7 |
| -6.6 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 3 | 3NT | ♠J | -2 | -8 |
| -6.6 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 24 | 3♣ | ♦7 | -2 | -8 |
| -11.5 | Round of 64 | TEAM PHOENIX | 5 | 3NT | ♦J | = | +1 |