EL AHMADY Waleed · BROWN
vs par split: bidding +1.23 · play +0.30
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.56/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.05/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% · declarer play 87.5% · defence 63.2%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 85.7% (7) | 66.7% (3) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 85.7% (7) |
| Defence | 63.6% (11) | 62.5% (8) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +4.38 (13) · a suit -0.65 (17)
vs par by level: part-score -0.08 (13) · game +3.13 (15) · slam +0.00 (2)
By role: declaring +2.78/bd (-0.64 vs par · 11) · defending +0.94/bd (+2.79 vs par · 19)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.76/bd (+2.62 vs par · 13) · not vulnerable +2.27/bd (+0.71 vs par · 17)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | E.Havas | J.Nakamaru-Pinder – J.Kenny | Closed | 10 | +20.7 | +2.07 | +0.50 |
| Round 4 | E.Havas | Y.Moulin – H.Setton | Closed | 10 | +27.1 | +2.71 | +4.30 |
| Round 5 | E.Havas | C.Koeck – D.Dufau | Closed | 10 | +0.6 | +0.06 | -0.20 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.0 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 19 | 6♣ | ♣6 | = | +12 |
| +8.8 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 12 | 3NT | ♦3 | -3 | +9 |
| +8.2 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 18 | 6♣ | ♠6 | = | -12 |
| +6.8 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 5 | 3NT | ♥Q | -2 | +11 |
| +6.1 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 1 | 2NT | ♦4 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.9 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 14 | 5♣ | ♥3 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.7 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 8 | 4♠ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| +4.4 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 6 | 3NT | ♠K | -2 | +7 |
| +4.1 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 17 | 3NT | ♦3 | -2 | +6 |
| +3.4 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 7 | 4♥ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.0 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 2 | 3NT | ♣Q | +3 | +14 |
| +3.0 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 11 | 1NT | ♣3 | = | +5 |
| +2.9 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 12 | 3♥ | ♣2 | = | +10 |
| +2.9 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 16 | 3♠ | ♣Q | +1 | +7 |
| +2.4 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 9 | 3♦ | ♠9 | = | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 13 | 3NT | ♦9 | -1 | +12 |
| +1.5 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 3 | 4♥ | ♥7 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.8 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 14 | 2♠ | ♠2 | +2 | -6 |
| +0.7 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 13 | 2♣ | ♦10 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 20 | 3NT | ♦2 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 10 | 2♠ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 17 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 11 | 2♦ | ♠J | -1 | -3 |
| -1.1 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 18 | 2NT | ♥4 | +1 | +0 |
| -4.1 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 15 | 2♥ | ♦6 | = | -6 |
| -4.5 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 19 | 1NT | ♥4 | +1 | -12 |
| -5.1 | Round 4 | MILLICENT5 | 4 | 1NT | ♠4 | +1 | -6 |
| -5.4 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 16 | 3NT | ♣K | = | +1 |
| -6.9 | Round 2 | CELTIC CONNECTION | 15 | 4♠ | ♣Q | +2 | -14 |
| -6.9 | Round 5 | WHY NOT | 20 | 4♥ | ♣4 | = | -11 |