Opatija 2015 — Kids Teams
📅 20 - 29 August 2015 · Opatija, Croatia
🔗 Official site: db.worldbridge.org →
Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top
Cumulative Victory Points. The 8 highlighted teams (marked ▶) advanced to the Quarterfinal (the knockout stage). Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.
| Place | Team | VP | Trend | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ▶ | SX XNWY | 105.46 | 19.86 | 17.51 | 18.30 | 15.52 | 6.00 | 14.28 | 3.22 | 10.77 | |
| 2 ▶ | SX XHEST | 101.37 | 4.95 | 17.34 | 17.68 | 4.95 | 14.00 | 6.00 | 18.15 | 18.30 | |
| 3 ▶ | CHINA RDFZ1 | 100.49 | 20.00 | 2.49 | 7.82 | 14.54 | 20.00 | 14.00 | 8.50 | 13.14 | |
| 4 ▶ | AZSUW AKADEMIABRYDZA | 100.04 | 15.75 | 19.55 | 1.70 | 15.05 | 2.49 | 20.00 | 11.50 | 14.00 | |
| 5 ▶ | SX HYSW | 98.27 | 15.05 | 4.25 | 13.43 | 5.46 | 17.34 | 5.72 | 19.86 | 17.16 | |
| 6 ▶ | CHINESE TAIPEI BLUE | 88.96 | 14.80 | 15.75 | 12.18 | 4.48 | 17.51 | 10.39 | 1.85 | 12.00 B | |
| 7 ▶ | CHINESE TAIPEI WHITE | 85.51 | 5.20 | 14.80 | 2.32 | 10.39 | 12.00 B | 17.16 | 16.78 | 6.86 | |
| 8 ▶ | SX XHLD | 81.99 | 17.51 | 0.45 | 6.57 | 9.61 | 2.16 | 12.00 B | 17.51 | 16.18 | |
| 9 | CHINA RDFZ3 | 76.96 | 4.25 | 2.66 | 12.00 B | 12.51 | 17.84 | 9.61 | 8.86 | 9.23 | |
| 10 | CHINA RDFZ2 | 62.91 | 0.00 | 12.00 B | 17.68 | 6.57 | 2.66 | 6.86 | 11.14 | 6.00 | |
| 11 | GERMANY | 56.32 | 2.49 | 8.86 | 17.84 | 13.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.00 B | 1.70 | |
| 12 | AUSSIE KIDS | 52.45 | 12.00 B | 5.20 | 2.16 | 7.49 | 8.50 | 13.14 | 0.14 | 3.82 | |
| 13 | ITALIA | 45.27 | 0.14 | 11.14 | 2.32 | 12.00 B | 11.50 | 2.84 | 2.49 | 2.84 |
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (8 of 8): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y.Shang | +2.36 |
| 2 | R.Wang | +2.36 |
| 2 | R.Li | +2.36 |
| 4 | Y.Liu | +2.14 |
| 5 | Z.Cai | +1.40 |
| 5 | Y.Ding | +1.40 |
| 7 | L.Cheng | +1.26 |
| 8 | P.Wang | +1.12 |
| 9 | Z.Wu | +1.00 |
| 10 | Y.Song | +0.93 |
| 10 | J.Wang | +0.93 |
| 12 | R.Mao | +0.90 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Z.Cai | 100.0% |
| 1 | H.Yu | 100.0% |
| 1 | Y.Lee | 100.0% |
| 4 | R.Pan | 94.7% |
| 5 | P.Hulanicki | 94.4% |
| 6 | R.Mao | 92.3% |
| 7 | R.Li | 90.9% |
| 8 | Z.Zhuo | 90.5% |
| 9 | Z.Wu | 90.0% |
| 9 | L.Nordmann | 90.0% |
| 11 | F.Doermer | 89.5% |
| 12 | L.Cheng | 88.9% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | P.Wang | 100.0% |
| 2 | R.Wang | 92.9% |
| 3 | M.Wu | 91.7% |
| 4 | Y.Shang | 90.9% |
| 5 | Z.Lin | 90.0% |
| 6 | Y.Ding | 87.5% |
| 7 | Y.Lan | 87.5% |
| 8 | M.Li | 85.7% |
| 9 | M.Rieger | 85.7% |
| 10 | H.Ko | 85.7% |
| 11 | Z.Cai | 84.6% |
| 12 | F.Doermer | 82.4% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | L.Cheng | 96.2% |
| 2 | R.Mao | 93.1% |
| 3 | P.Hulanicki | 92.1% |
| 3 | T.Kielbasa | 92.1% |
| 5 | P.Wang | 92.0% |
| 6 | S.Qiu | 90.5% |
| 6 | H.Yu | 90.5% |
| 8 | B.Jiang | 90.3% |
| 8 | R.Pan | 90.3% |
| 8 | S.Capobianco | 90.3% |
| 8 | F.Porta | 90.3% |
| 12 | H.Dai | 89.3% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 7 · Bd 10 | 12 | 29.8 | 5♦ +700 SX XHLD (+15.0) | 6♥ +1460 CHINA RDFZ2 (+14.8) |
| Round 3 · Bd 23 | 12 | 27.7 | 3♣x +1070 SX HYSW (+14.6) | 4♠x +790 SX HYSW (+13.1) |
| Round 5 · Bd 17 | 12 | 25.2 | 6♠ +980 CHINA RDFZ3 (+12.5) | 6♣x +500 SX HYSW (+12.7) |
| Round 6 · Bd 21 | 12 | 24.9 | 7♥ +2210 AZSUW AKADEMIABRYDZA (+14.3) | 5♥ -710 SX XNWY (+10.6) |
| Round 6 · Bd 29 | 12 | 24.6 | 6NT +300 AZSUW AKADEMIABRYDZA (+11.9) | 6♣ +1370 CHINA RDFZ1 (+12.7) |
| Round 4 · Bd 4 | 12 | 21.9 | 4♥x +800 SX XHLD (+9.9) | 3NT +300 GERMANY (+12.0) |
| Round 1 · Bd 6 | 12 | 21.7 | 4♥x +590 AZSUW AKADEMIABRYDZA (+8.3) | 4♠ +620 CHINESE TAIPEI BLUE (+13.4) |
| Round 5 · Bd 18 | 12 | 21.3 | 3NT +100 SX XHEST (+7.1) | 3♦x +1400 CHINESE TAIPEI BLUE (+14.2) |
| Round 3 · Bd 24 | 12 | 21.1 | 4♦x +510 CHINA RDFZ1 (+9.9) | 5♦x +500 CHINA RDFZ2 (+11.2) |
| Round 6 · Bd 25 | 12 | 20.9 | 6♠ +980 CHINA RDFZ1 (+12.1) | 6♠ +100 CHINESE TAIPEI WHITE (+8.8) |
| Round 2 · Bd 20 | 12 | 20.8 | 6♠ +200 AZSUW AKADEMIABRYDZA (+7.3) | 5♥x +1100 CHINESE TAIPEI WHITE (+13.5) |
| Round 3 · Bd 22 | 12 | 20.7 | 2♠ +200 SX XHLD (+6.6) | 3NTxx +1000 SX XNWY (+14.1) |
| Round 5 · Bd 12 | 12 | 20.6 | 4♥ -480 SX HYSW (+8.5) | 7♥ +1510 ITALIA (+12.1) |
| Round 7 · Bd 8 | 12 | 20.0 | 6♠ +100 CHINESE TAIPEI WHITE (+9.6) | 6NT +990 SX XHLD (+10.4) |