Opatija 2019 — U16 Teams
📅 20 - 29 August 2019 · Opatija, Croatia
🔗 Official site: db.worldbridge.org →
Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top
Cumulative Victory Points. The 8 highlighted teams (marked ▶) advanced to the Quarterfinal (the knockout stage). Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.
| Place | Team | VP | Trend | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ▶ | SXSATURN | 111.15 | 13.78 | 9.56 | 14.39 | 17.87 | 15.50 | 14.96 | 6.88 | 18.21 | |
| 2 ▶ | SHSLLS1 | 107.29 | 6.22 | 20.00 | 17.69 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 18.97 | 0.63 | 13.78 | |
| 3 ▶ | SHARKS | 105.55 | 12.05 | 10.44 | 12.42 | 3.77 | 20.00 | 11.27 | 19.37 | 16.23 | |
| 4 ▶ | POLAND | 104.52 | 17.69 | 8.73 | 2.31 | 17.31 | 9.14 | 19.11 | 13.12 | 17.11 | |
| 5 ▶ | EYE OF THE TIGER | 97.15 | 20.00 | 13.45 | 16.23 | 10.00 | 4.50 | 8.73 | 6.55 | 17.69 | |
| 6 ▶ | SXVENUS | 87.31 | 18.83 | 6.55 | 5.61 | 19.11 | 0.00 | 17.69 | 15.75 | 3.77 | |
| 7 ▶ | SXMARS | 86.95 | 7.95 | 17.87 | 2.69 | 20.00 | 7.95 | 5.04 | 13.45 | 12.00 B | |
| 8 ▶ | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 83.25 | 17.11 | 11.27 | 3.77 | 16.23 | 12.05 | 1.03 | 20.00 | 1.79 | |
| 9 | CS21MSCHOOL | 77.97 | 2.31 | 11.67 | 18.04 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 12.00 B | 15.75 | 17.31 | |
| 10 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 76.59 | 11.67 | 14.09 | 17.31 | 2.13 | 10.86 | 2.31 | 12.00 B | 6.22 | |
| 11 | INDIA | 64.57 | 1.17 | 8.33 | 18.97 | 2.69 | 12.00 B | 3.54 | 0.00 | 17.87 | |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 62.90 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 12.00 B | 10.00 | 17.50 | 0.89 | 17.31 | 2.31 | |
| 13 | CAPRISUN | 58.83 | 0.00 | 12.00 B | 1.96 | 10.00 | 11.27 | 16.46 | 4.25 | 2.89 | |
| 14 | CROATIA U16 | 50.37 | 8.33 | 2.13 | 1.03 | 12.00 B | 8.73 | 12.77 | 2.69 | 2.69 | |
| 15 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 41.60 | 12.00 B | 5.91 | 7.58 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 7.23 | 4.25 | 2.13 |
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (8 of 8): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y.Jiang | +3.38 |
| 2 | N.Xu | +2.50 |
| 3 | L.Ciborowska | +1.94 |
| 3 | K.Ciborowski | +1.94 |
| 5 | T.Tang | +1.91 |
| 6 | J.Bakhshi | +1.88 |
| 6 | M.Bertheau | +1.88 |
| 8 | Y.Chen | +1.80 |
| 8 | J.Liu | +1.80 |
| 10 | Z.Gao | +1.56 |
| 11 | C.Bens | +1.43 |
| 11 | L.Bonin | +1.43 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Z.Tian | 100.0% |
| 1 | L.Kasperczyk | 100.0% |
| 1 | N.Lang | 100.0% |
| 1 | A.Mehta | 100.0% |
| 1 | S.Liu | 100.0% |
| 1 | Q.Zhang | 100.0% |
| 1 | S.Wei | 100.0% |
| 8 | R.Sun | 92.3% |
| 9 | Y.Chen | 91.7% |
| 9 | M.Xu | 91.7% |
| 11 | T.Tang | 90.9% |
| 11 | S.Yang | 90.9% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | P.Tchoulkine | 100.0% |
| 1 | F.Kurlit | 100.0% |
| 3 | F.Lin | 93.3% |
| 4 | S.Ma | 92.9% |
| 5 | L.Sartori | 92.3% |
| 6 | C.Su | 91.7% |
| 7 | H.Ma | 90.9% |
| 8 | T.Chowdhury | 90.0% |
| 9 | N.Jancic | 88.9% |
| 10 | Z.Sun | 88.9% |
| 11 | Z.Tian | 85.7% |
| 12 | J.Liu | 84.6% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y.Chen | 100.0% |
| 1 | J.Liu | 100.0% |
| 3 | Z.Xie | 94.1% |
| 4 | H.Shen | 93.8% |
| 5 | M.Roches | 92.3% |
| 5 | P.Tchoulkine | 92.3% |
| 7 | Y.Fu | 90.9% |
| 8 | T.Chowdhury | 90.0% |
| 8 | A.Mehta | 90.0% |
| 10 | K.Kuflowski | 89.5% |
| 10 | F.Kurlit | 89.5% |
| 10 | C.Bens | 89.5% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 6 · Bd 10 | 14 | 25.5 | 3NT +660 EYE OF THE TIGER (+10.1) | 4♥x +1100 POLAND (+15.4) |
| Round 4 · Bd 28 | 14 | 23.0 | 4♥ +620 SXVENUS (+12.8) | 4♠x +590 SHSLLS1 (+10.2) |
| Round 5 · Bd 5 | 14 | 21.8 | 6NT +1440 RDFZ ZHIHAOLE (+6.3) | 6♠ +100 SHSLLS1 (+15.5) |
| Round 2 · Bd 16 | 14 | 21.7 | 4♥x +800 INDIA (+12.4) | 5♦x +300 POLAND (+9.3) |
| Round 2 · Bd 11 | 14 | 21.2 | 4♥x +690 RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT (+7.8) | 4♠ +480 SHSLLS1 (+13.4) |
| Round 7 · Bd 19 | 14 | 21.2 | 5♠ +500 TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL (+8.7) | 4♥ +620 RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT (+12.5) |
| Round 8 · Bd 28 | 14 | 21.2 | 3NT +630 SXSATURN (+11.8) | 4♥ +420 SHSLLS1 (+9.4) |
| Round 3 · Bd 19 | 14 | 20.9 | 6♠ +200 EYE OF THE TIGER (+10.4) | 4♠x +990 SXSATURN (+10.5) |
| Round 5 · Bd 7 | 14 | 20.8 | 3NT +500 SXSATURN (+8.8) | 3NT +660 SHARKS (+12.0) |
| Round 2 · Bd 10 | 14 | 19.6 | 5♥x +1100 SHSLLS1 (+12.2) | 3♥ -100 SHSLLS1 (+7.4) |
| Round 1 · Bd 2 | 14 | 19.4 | 6♥ +50 SXSATURN (+12.4) | 6♥ +980 CS21MSCHOOL (+7.0) |
| Round 4 · Bd 29 | 14 | 18.1 | 5♦ +400 SHSLLS1 (+10.3) | 3NT +630 SXSATURN (+7.8) |
| Round 1 · Bd 6 | 14 | 17.9 | 5♦ +200 POLAND (+8.1) | 5♦ +600 SXSATURN (+9.8) |
| Round 4 · Bd 31 | 14 | 17.6 | 5♣x +800 RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT (+7.8) | 5♠ +100 EYE OF THE TIGER (+9.8) |