COHEN Ilan · EMERALD
vs par split: bidding -0.46 · play -0.18
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.24/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.37/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 93.8%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 75.0% (4) | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (3) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 100.0% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 50.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT -2.60 (10) · a suit +0.44 (18)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (12) · game -0.47 (15) · slam -11.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.19/bd (-1.83 vs par · 12) · defending -1.95/bd (+0.25 vs par · 16)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.34/bd (-0.79 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -0.87/bd (-0.50 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | Y.Zack | N.L'Ecuyer – P.Street | Open | 14 | -14.2 | -1.01 | -0.21 |
| Round of 64 | Y.Zack | T.Forrester – C.Lorenzini | Open | 14 | -2.7 | -0.19 | -1.07 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 8 | 6♦ | ♦9 | = | -11 |
| +3.4 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 51 | 4♠ | ♠6 | = | +3 |
| +3.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 48 | 3NT | ♠10 | +3 | -12 |
| +2.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 50 | 3♥ | ♠5 | -1 | -2 |
| +2.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 1 | 1NT | ♠5 | +1 | +6 |
| +2.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 13 | 3♠ | ♥K | +2 | -9 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 3 | 2♥ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 49 | 3NT | ♠A | -1 | -8 |
| +0.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 56 | 3NT | ♣J | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 52 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 47 | 1♠ | ♣6 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 9 | 3NT | ♠J | +2 | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 14 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 2 | 4♥ | ♣A | -1 | +2 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 5 | 2♠ | ♦K | -1 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 45 | 1NT | ♥Q | +1 | +1 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 44 | 4♥ | ♣Q | = | +3 |
| -0.6 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 46 | 2♦ | ♠9 | = | +2 |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 11 | 2♥ | ♣3 | = | +1 |
| -1.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 55 | 3♥ | ♦K | +1 | +6 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 53 | 3NT | ♥9 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 6 | 3♦ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 10 | 4♥ | ♠9 | +2 | +12 |
| -2.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 4 | 1NT | ♦Q | -1 | -6 |
| -3.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 54 | 4♠ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| -7.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 7 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| -9.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 43 | 3NT | ♠A | = | -7 |
| -9.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 12 | 5♦ | ♠7 | = | +0 |