AMOILS Leslie · THE FRUSH
vs par split: bidding +1.93 · play +0.21
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.06/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.96/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 77.8%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (2) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 71.4% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +5.50 (2) · a suit +1.58 (12)
vs par by level: part-score +1.78 (9) · game +2.80 (5)
By role: declaring +0.36/bd (-3.20 vs par · 5) · defending +1.39/bd (+5.11 vs par · 9)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.24/bd (+3.86 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +1.80/bd (+0.43 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | V.Bessis | A.Asulin – B.Drijver | Open | 14 | +14.3 | +1.02 | +2.14 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.2 | Round of 64 | PDC | 11 | 5♥ | ♣A | -1 | +8 |
| +4.3 | Round of 64 | PDC | 3 | 3♣ | ♦A | -1 | +6 |
| +3.5 | Round of 64 | PDC | 8 | 5♦ | ♣K | +1 | -11 |
| +3.2 | Round of 64 | PDC | 7 | 2♥ | ♥9 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | PDC | 10 | 2♠ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | PDC | 9 | 5♣ | ♣6 | -1 | +5 |
| -0.0 | Round of 64 | PDC | 1 | 2♥ | ♦K | -1 | +3 |
| +0.0 | Round of 64 | PDC | 2 | 2♥ | ♦3 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.0 | Round of 64 | PDC | 6 | 3♠ | ♥10 | +1 | -6 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | PDC | 13 | 3♥ | ♥6 | +1 | +10 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | PDC | 12 | 3NT | ♣7 | +2 | +11 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | PDC | 5 | 4♥ | ♥6 | = | +1 |
| -2.5 | Round of 64 | PDC | 4 | 1NT | ♠Q | +1 | +0 |
| -4.2 | Round of 64 | PDC | 14 | 2♦ | ♦4 | -4 | -2 |