KOZLOVE Ellen · TORLOVEBECK
vs par split: bidding +0.07 · play -0.39
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.07/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.77/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 87.5% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 77.8%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 85.7% (7) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (3) |
| Defence | 33.3% (3) | 86.7% (15) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.25 (4) · a suit -0.33 (24)
vs par by level: part-score -1.93 (14) · game +0.54 (13) · slam +11.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.39/bd (-4.00 vs par · 10) · defending -0.87/bd (+1.72 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.54/bd (+0.43 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable +0.14/bd (-1.07 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | L.Kozlove | R.Welland – S.Auken | Closed | 14 | -14.4 | -1.03 | +0.00 |
| Round of 64 | L.Kozlove | R.Welland – S.Auken | Closed | 14 | -5.2 | -0.37 | -0.64 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.3 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 22 | 4♠ | ♥A | +2 | +13 |
| +6.1 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 25 | 4♥ | ♦2 | +1 | +1 |
| +4.7 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 8 | 4♠ | ♣2 | +2 | -10 |
| +3.7 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 21 | 5♣x | ♥K | -1 | +6 |
| +3.4 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 4 | 2♥ | ♦K | = | +6 |
| +2.6 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 17 | 3♥ | ♠Q | -2 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 28 | 6♣ | ♣8 | +1 | +11 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 9 | 3NT | ♥J | -1 | +5 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 2 | 3♣ | ♦7 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 12 | 4♠ | ♥10 | +1 | +11 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 3 | 2♣ | ♦2 | = | +2 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 1 | 2♦ | ♠A | = | +2 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 5 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +1 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 20 | 3NT | ♥9 | +3 | -1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 14 | 2♠ | ♥4 | = | +1 |
| -1.8 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 7 | 2♥ | ♥9 | = | +0 |
| -1.9 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 6 | 2♠ | ♦J | = | -8 |
| -1.9 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 27 | 2♠ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 26 | 3♠ | ♣A | -1 | -5 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 11 | 4♥ | ♠2 | = | -3 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 18 | 3♣ | ♠8 | = | -5 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 24 | 3NT | ♦K | -1 | -5 |
| -2.4 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 16 | 2♦ | ♥2 | +2 | -7 |
| -4.7 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 19 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | -6 |
| -4.9 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 10 | 2♠ | ♦K | -2 | -7 |
| -7.9 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 13 | 3NT | ♦6 | = | +0 |
| -8.1 | Round of 64 | NOLAND | 15 | 5♥ | ♣K | -2 | -11 |