WINESTOCK Sheri · VEGAS STRONG
293rank
-14.5Butler · 14 bds
-1.04per board
±3.4swing
-1.79vs par /bd
-0.09adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding -0.07 · play -1.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.95/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.09/bd
Card play — on target: defence 60.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Defence | · | 60.0% (5) |
vs par by strain: NT -6.67 (3) · a suit -0.46 (11)
vs par by level: part-score +0.43 (7) · game -4.00 (7)
By role: declaring -1.48/bd (-4.56 vs par · 9) · defending -0.24/bd (+3.20 vs par · 5)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.91/bd (-2.00 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -1.16/bd (-1.57 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | F.Gitelman | M.Jacobus – B.Jacobus | Open | 14 | -14.5 | -1.04 | -1.79 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.4 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 10 | 2♠ | ♥3 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 11 | 4♥ | ♥3 | = | +3 |
| +1.8 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 7 | 2♠ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 14 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -2 | -1 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 1 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | -2 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 6 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +7 |
| +0.9 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 3 | 2♠ | ♥3 | = | -1 |
| -0.0 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 2 | 3♥ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 12 | 3NT | ♥3 | +1 | -11 |
| -2.9 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 8 | 5♦ | ♥3 | = | +11 |
| -3.4 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 4 | 2♥ | ♥3 | = | -6 |
| -3.5 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 9 | 3NT | ♥3 | -2 | -7 |
| -5.6 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 13 | 4♥ | ♥3 | -1 | -12 |
| -9.4 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 5 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -1 | -11 |