WOOLSEY Kit · MCCALLUM
vs par split: bidding -0.07 · play -1.29
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +1.08/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.55/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 57.1%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 66.7% (3) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (3) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 40.0% (5) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +1.67 (3) · a suit -2.18 (11)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (5) · game -0.86 (7) · slam -6.50 (2)
By role: declaring +0.53/bd (-1.57 vs par · 7) · defending -3.77/bd (-1.14 vs par · 7)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.47/bd (+0.43 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -2.77/bd (-3.14 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | S.Woolsey | W.Wang – Y.Liu | Closed | 14 | -22.7 | -1.62 | -1.36 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 22 | 6♦ | ♥K | = | -2 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 15 | 4♠ | ♥A | -2 | +5 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 24 | 3NT | ♦K | -1 | +5 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 26 | 3♠ | ♣K | -1 | +5 |
| +1.9 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 27 | 2♠ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 20 | 3NT | ♣4 | +2 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 19 | 2♦ | ♠5 | = | +1 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 28 | 6♣ | ♣5 | +1 | -11 |
| -4.0 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 16 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| -4.9 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 17 | 3♦ | ♠Q | -4 | -3 |
| -5.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 18 | 2♥ | ♦6 | +3 | -3 |
| -6.1 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 25 | 4♥ | ♦2 | +1 | -1 |
| -14.4 | Round of 64 | CFSC | 21 | 5♣x | ♥K | = | -15 |