CARMICHAEL Jenni · JT BICEPS
vs par split: bidding -0.05 · play +0.55
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.05/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.08/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 92.9% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 92.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (4) | 90.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (6) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 95.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (4) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT -0.14 (7) · a suit +0.63 (35)
vs par by level: part-score -1.00 (17) · game -0.53 (19) · slam +8.00 (6)
By role: declaring +0.18/bd (-1.24 vs par · 17) · defending -0.07/bd (+1.68 vs par · 25)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.24/bd (-1.33 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable +1.29/bd (+2.33 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | T.Carmichael | C.D'Ovidio – M.Bompis | Closed | 14 | +0.3 | +0.02 | -0.14 |
| Round of 32 | T.Carmichael | S.Shan – L.Gan | Closed | 14 | +10.7 | +0.76 | +3.21 |
| Round of 32 | T.Carmichael | S.Shan – L.Gan | Closed | 14 | -9.8 | -0.70 | -1.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.0 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 14 | 6♥ | ♦A | = | +11 |
| +6.8 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 9 | 5♣ | ♥8 | -1 | +12 |
| +6.1 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 25 | 5♥ | ♦2 | = | +1 |
| +4.7 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 11 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | +3 |
| +4.0 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 16 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| +3.3 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 8 | 2NT | ♣5 | -1 | +5 |
| +3.1 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 18 | 4♣ | ♥A | -2 | +0 |
| +2.9 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 19 | 4♠ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| +2.8 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 24 | 3♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| +2.8 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 17 | 6♦ | ♣K | +1 | +11 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 27 | 3♠ | ♣8 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.3 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 4 | 6♠ | ♦J | +1 | +13 |
| +1.5 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 3 | 5♠x | ♣K | +1 | +7 |
| +1.4 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 28 | 6♣ | ♣9 | +1 | +11 |
| +1.2 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 16 | 3♠ | ♣3 | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 17 | 3♥ | ♠Q | -1 | -2 |
| +0.7 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 22 | 3♠ | ♠10 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 20 | 3NT | ♣5 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 23 | 3NT | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 5 | 4♠ | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 12 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 21 | 4♦ | ♥2 | -1 | -6 |
| -0.8 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 20 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -1 |
| -1.1 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 24 | 6NT | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 2 | 3♥ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 6 | 3♥ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| -1.3 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 10 | 3♥ | ♦7 | -1 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 21 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +1 |
| -1.5 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 18 | 3NT | ♠6 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.8 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 15 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | -6 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 27 | 4♥ | ♠J | -1 | -4 |
| -2.2 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 26 | 3♠ | ♣A | -1 | -5 |
| -2.3 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 13 | 3♥ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 25 | 2♦ | ♦3 | = | +2 |
| -2.9 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 1 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -3.1 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 28 | 4♠ | ♣K | -1 | -12 |
| -3.7 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 26 | 5♣x | ♦K | -2 | -8 |
| -4.8 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 19 | 1NT | ♣6 | -3 | -6 |
| -5.2 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 22 | 6♦ | ♥K | = | +2 |
| -5.2 | Round of 32 | LU DONG | 7 | 3♣ | ♦2 | +1 | -6 |
| -6.4 | Round of 64 | ZIMMERMANN | 15 | 5♥ | ♣K | -1 | -9 |