JOEL Geeske · JOEL

434rank
-45.7Butler · 21 bds
-2.18per board
±5.0swing
-1.38vs par /bd
-1.81adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -2.7 -15.2 -27.8by round

vs par split: bidding -1.61 · play -0.17

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.37/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.81/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 77.8%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·100.0% (3)
Declarer play50.0% (2)·
Defence100.0% (1)75.0% (8)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT -5.25 (8) · a suit +1.00 (13)

vs par by level: part-score +1.60 (5) · game -2.47 (15) · slam +0.00 (1)

By role: declaring -2.51/bd (-4.80 vs par · 10) · defending -1.87/bd (+1.73 vs par · 11)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -3.29/bd (-0.91 vs par · 11) · not vulnerable -0.95/bd (-1.90 vs par · 10)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 1S.WeinsteinC.Chan – F.Cheung L.Closed7-2.7-0.39+1.14
Round 3S.WeinsteinJ.Romanowski – M.RossardClosed7-15.2-2.17-2.57
Round 4S.WeinsteinM.Orey Capucho – M.LaraOpen7-27.8-3.97-2.71

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+10.9Round 1BLING14♠x♥Q-4+9
+2.8Round 4MARVELOUS243NT♠8+2+0
+1.9Round 1BLING65♦-1+5
+1.0Round 3ROSSARD214♠♥10+1+0
+0.4Round 3ROSSARD203NT♠K+1-1
-0.1Round 4MARVELOUS253NT♠4=+0
-0.3Round 1BLING24♥♦K+1+0
-0.4Round 1BLING42♣+1+10
-0.4Round 3ROSSARD173♦♣A-1+5
-0.9Round 3ROSSARD194♥♦3+2-1
-1.0Round 3ROSSARD161NT♥6+2+0
-1.3Round 1BLING74♥♦2=+1
-2.1Round 1BLING53NT♠T-2-5
-2.1Round 4MARVELOUS274♣♦A=-1
-2.8Round 4MARVELOUS223NT♦J+2-13
-5.0Round 4MARVELOUS283♥♠J-2-6
-6.7Round 3ROSSARD183NT♥10-2-11
-7.6Round 3ROSSARD154♥x♣A=-10
-8.3Round 4MARVELOUS264♠♣A=+1
-11.4Round 1BLING33NT-2-12
-12.3Round 4MARVELOUS236♥♥7=+0