LEWIS Linda · GLASSON
vs par split: bidding -1.66 · play +0.66
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.54/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 207 · declarer play 85.7% #30 of 206 · defence 92.3% #31 of 208
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 88.9% (9) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT -1.54 (13) · a suit -0.68 (22)
vs par by level: part-score -0.27 (11) · game -1.87 (23) · slam +11.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.22/bd (-1.04 vs par · 22) · defending -1.15/bd (-0.92 vs par · 13)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.01/bd (-0.90 vs par · 19) · not vulnerable +0.76/bd (-1.12 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | P.Lewis | S.Gillis – M.Harding | Open | 7 | -9.6 | -1.37 | -4.29 |
| Round 4 | P.Lewis | Y.Wu – Z.Zhen | Open | 7 | +8.3 | +1.19 | +0.29 |
| Round 5 | P.Lewis | Z.Chen – R.Xu | Open | 7 | +4.9 | +0.70 | -3.14 |
| Round 6 | P.Lewis | Z.Li – SHEN (1) Qi | Open | 7 | +5.2 | +0.74 | +0.14 |
| Round 8 | P.Lewis | C.Cheek – L.Deas | Open | 7 | +3.2 | +0.46 | +2.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.1 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 27 | 3♥x | ♥3 | = | +10 |
| +8.4 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 13 | 4♥x | ♠6 | = | +14 |
| +7.8 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 24 | 3NT | ♠J | = | +7 |
| +7.5 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 8 | 3NT | ♥9 | +1 | +7 |
| +6.6 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 25 | 6♥ | ♠3 | -1 | +11 |
| +5.0 | Round 5 | XBA | 7 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | -13 |
| +4.0 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 28 | 1NT | ♣5 | = | +5 |
| +3.7 | Round 5 | XBA | 5 | 1NT | ♠4 | = | +5 |
| +2.5 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 19 | 3NT | ♦9 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.4 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 27 | 4♠ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 5 | XBA | 4 | 4♠ | ♣8 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 15 | 2♠ | ♣4 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 28 | 2♥ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 14 | 4♥ | ♣3 | -2 | -1 |
| +0.5 | Round 5 | XBA | 3 | 2♠ | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 23 | 3NT | ♠10 | +1 | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 22 | 4♥ | ♥2 | = | +1 |
| +0.0 | Round 5 | XBA | 6 | 3♥ | ♦K | +1 | -4 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | XBA | 2 | 3♣ | ♠6 | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 12 | 1NT | ♣5 | +2 | +6 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 20 | 3NT | ♦Q | +1 | -1 |
| -1.1 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 22 | 4♠ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 23 | 3NT | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| -1.5 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 21 | 4♥ | ♦10 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 25 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | -6 |
| -2.2 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 10 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 16 | 2NT | ♠Q | -2 | -11 |
| -3.2 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 9 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | -14 |
| -3.5 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 26 | 4♥x | ♣8 | -2 | +3 |
| -3.9 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 18 | 3NT | ♣10 | -1 | -13 |
| -4.3 | Round 8 | LYNCH | 24 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | +0 |
| -5.7 | Round 3 | GILLIS | 17 | 4♥ | ♦2 | -2 | -6 |
| -6.1 | Round 6 | GZ. ZHAOHENG2 | 11 | 3NT | ♦3 | -1 | -11 |
| -6.2 | Round 5 | XBA | 1 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -1 | -10 |
| -9.1 | Round 4 | TIANJIN CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOCI | 26 | 3♥ | ♠A | +1 | -14 |