HELNESS Tor · MONACO
1rank
+24.2Butler · 7 bds
+3.46per board
±4.8swing
-2.00vs par /bd
+2.84adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding -0.14 · play -1.86
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.62/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +2.84/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | · |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | · |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (2) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -3.00 (2) · a suit -1.60 (5)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (1) · game -2.00 (3) · slam -2.67 (3)
By role: declaring +3.38/bd (-7.75 vs par · 4) · defending +3.57/bd (+5.67 vs par · 3)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +2.58/bd (-7.75 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable +4.63/bd (+5.67 vs par · 3)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 4 | G.Helgemo | P.Qiao – X.Jing | Closed | 7 | +24.2 | +3.46 | -2.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.4 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 26 | 6♦ | ♣A | = | -2 |
| +9.9 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 24 | 6♦ | ♠4 | -2 | +11 |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 27 | 5♣ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 25 | 3NT | ♣4 | +3 | -12 |
| +0.8 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 28 | 3NT | ♣2 | -1 | +6 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 22 | 2♥ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | HEILONGJIANG TEAM | 23 | 6♣ | ♠10 | -1 | -17 |