KONG Maoliang · DARUI INDUSTRY
vs par split: bidding -0.57 · play -1.05
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.09/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.69/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% · declarer play 55.6% · defence 72.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | 33.3% (3) | 66.7% (6) |
| Defence | 66.7% (3) | 75.0% (8) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -3.71 (7) · a suit -0.57 (14)
vs par by level: part-score +0.43 (7) · game -0.36 (11) · slam -11.00 (3)
By role: declaring +0.39/bd (-6.40 vs par · 10) · defending +0.79/bd (+2.73 vs par · 11)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.60/bd (-5.00 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable +0.60/bd (+1.46 vs par · 11)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | L.Huang | J.Dai – L.Yang | Closed | 7 | -0.5 | -0.07 | +2.14 |
| Round 4 | L.Huang | I.Coldea – B.Marina | Closed | 7 | +22.6 | +3.23 | -1.86 |
| Round 6 | L.Huang | S.Chen – J.Li | Closed | 7 | -9.5 | -1.36 | -5.14 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.4 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 26 | 6♦ | ♣Q | = | -2 |
| +8.8 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 24 | 3NT | ♠6 | -1 | +11 |
| +8.2 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 13 | 4♠ | ♥8 | -2 | +10 |
| +3.9 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 27 | 5♣ | ♦A | +1 | +1 |
| +3.5 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 28 | 3NT | ♠5 | -2 | +8 |
| +2.9 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 9 | 4NT | ♠5 | +2 | -12 |
| +2.8 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 11 | 2♥ | ♣8 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.6 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 9 | 3♣ | ♦A | +2 | +6 |
| +1.8 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 14 | 3♦ | ♦3 | -1 | +4 |
| +1.0 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 12 | 5♣ | ♥A | -1 | -1 |
| -0.1 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 13 | 1NT | ♠A | -1 | -1 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 11 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | +10 |
| -1.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 25 | 3NT | ♣2 | +1 | -12 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 22 | 3♦ | ♣A | -2 | -2 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | ROMANIA | 23 | 6♣ | ♠7 | -1 | -17 |
| -2.8 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 14 | 5♣ | ♠3 | = | -3 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 8 | 3♣ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -3.3 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 10 | 3NT | ♠Q | -1 | -6 |
| -3.5 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 12 | 4♠ | ♦A | -1 | -10 |
| -5.5 | Round 6 | SHENZHEN NANGANG POWER | 8 | 2♠ | ♣A | -1 | -9 |
| -10.7 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 10 | 6NT | ♥5 | -3 | -14 |