LI Qiang · HONG KONG HAI JIU

467rank
-3.1Butler · 7 bds
-0.44per board
±4.4swing
-2.00vs par /bd
-0.42adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -2.29 · play +0.29

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.03/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.42/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 75.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (2)·
Declarer play100.0% (1)100.0% (1)
Defence100.0% (2)50.0% (2)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT -2.25 (4) · a suit -1.67 (3)

vs par by level: part-score -3.50 (4) · game +0.00 (3)

By role: declaring -2.30/bd (-5.00 vs par · 3) · defending +0.95/bd (+0.25 vs par · 4)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.53/bd (+0.00 vs par · 3) · not vulnerable +0.38/bd (-3.50 vs par · 4)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 2Y.LiuN.Deng – W.GuoOpen7-3.1-0.44-2.00

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+5.5Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS93♦x♦4-2+3
+4.7Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS134♠x♥10-3+4
+3.4Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS141NT♥A+2+1
-2.9Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS81NT♣4+1-6
-3.5Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS103NT♥9+1+0
-4.5Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS112♠♥K+3-12
-5.8Round 2BEIJING LAWYERS123NT♥A-3-4