HOWARD Justin · SILVERFOX
vs par split: bidding +1.61 · play -1.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.11/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.89/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 57.1% #282 of 310 · declarer play 62.5% #267 of 310 · defence 88.2% #121 of 311
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 40.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 33.3% (3) | 80.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 86.7% (15) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 50.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +1.80 (5) · a suit +0.35 (23)
vs par by level: part-score +3.40 (15) · game -4.27 (11) · slam +6.50 (2)
By role: declaring -1.27/bd (-1.73 vs par · 11) · defending -0.47/bd (+2.12 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -3.27/bd (-1.69 vs par · 13) · not vulnerable +1.37/bd (+2.60 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | P.Hollands | L.Hu – X.Li | Closed | 7 | -7.9 | -1.13 | -0.14 |
| Round 2 | P.Hollands | F.Zhou – L.Meng | Closed | 7 | -32.2 | -4.60 | -1.00 |
| Round 3 | P.Hollands | W.Ahmady – A.Hussein | Closed | 7 | +8.1 | +1.16 | +1.29 |
| Round 7 | P.Hollands | C.Balicki – A.Zmudzinski | Closed | 7 | +10.0 | +1.43 | +2.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.5 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 21 | 2♦ | ♣10 | = | +12 |
| +4.8 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 1 | 2♦x | ♥Q | -3 | +2 |
| +3.6 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 18 | 4♥ | ♦5 | -1 | +0 |
| +3.2 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 12 | 3♦ | ♣2 | = | +5 |
| +3.0 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 18 | 3NT | ♥3 | +2 | +13 |
| +2.7 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 3 | 2♥ | ♠K | +1 | +0 |
| +2.7 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 15 | 4♥ | ♣4 | -1 | +12 |
| +2.6 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 5 | 3♠ | ♣8 | -2 | +2 |
| +2.6 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 21 | 6♠ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 16 | 1NT | ♠2 | = | +8 |
| +1.9 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 20 | 2♠ | ♠J | = | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 16 | 5♥x | ♠4 | -1 | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 2 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +3 | +10 |
| +0.8 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 4 | 1NT | ♣A | -1 | +11 |
| +0.4 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 20 | 3♦ | ♣8 | -2 | +2 |
| -0.6 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 19 | 2♠ | ♦10 | -1 | -2 |
| -0.7 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 15 | 4♥ | ♠10 | +1 | -11 |
| -0.7 | Round 7 | CAYNE | 17 | 4♥ | ♦6 | -2 | -7 |
| -1.2 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 11 | 3♠ | ♦2 | = | -1 |
| -1.7 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 17 | 2♠ | ♦J | +2 | +4 |
| -1.8 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 8 | 2♣ | ♣4 | -3 | -1 |
| -2.3 | Round 3 | HUSSEIN | 19 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -6 |
| -3.2 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 14 | 3♠ | ♦J | = | -1 |
| -8.4 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 6 | 3NT | ♥A | -2 | -13 |
| -8.4 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 9 | 3NT | ♦9 | -3 | -10 |
| -8.4 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 13 | 6♠ | ♥A | +1 | +13 |
| -11.2 | Round 1 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 7 | 4♥ | ♦6 | = | -13 |
| -12.4 | Round 2 | SHAANXI ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN | 10 | 4♠x | ♥7 | -4 | -12 |