HE Xiaofeng · TIANJIN COM-JADEITE
vs par split: bidding +1.03 · play +0.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.11/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.84/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.0% #47 of 277 · declarer play 80.0% #106 of 277 · defence 78.9% #188 of 277
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 90.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (3) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 66.7% (3) | 81.2% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (6) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +1.50 (8) · a suit +0.89 (27)
vs par by level: part-score -0.06 (16) · game +1.69 (16) · slam +3.33 (3)
By role: declaring +1.27/bd (-0.88 vs par · 16) · defending +0.27/bd (+2.63 vs par · 19)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.20/bd (+0.44 vs par · 18) · not vulnerable +1.72/bd (+1.65 vs par · 17)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | B.He | G.Manna – K.Samant | Open | 7 | +9.2 | +1.31 | +1.00 |
| Round 2 | B.He | J.Dai – L.Yang | Closed | 7 | +13.0 | +1.86 | +4.14 |
| Round 4 | B.He | W.Guo – X.Xue | Closed | 7 | +15.4 | +2.20 | -0.14 |
| Round 5 | B.He | Y.Tang – J.Yao | Closed | 7 | -24.2 | -3.46 | -2.57 |
| Round 7 | B.He | G.Miao – Z.Xu | Closed | 7 | +12.2 | +1.74 | +2.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.3 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 28 | 4♠x | ♦K | = | +14 |
| +6.2 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 22 | 4♥ | ♦5 | = | +1 |
| +6.0 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 13 | 4♠ | ♥3 | +3 | +17 |
| +5.0 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 10 | 3♠x | ♣A | -1 | +7 |
| +4.7 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 5 | 4♠ | ♥A | -3 | +4 |
| +4.4 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 18 | 5♦ | ♥3 | +1 | +13 |
| +3.9 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 4 | 1NT | ♣K | +1 | +12 |
| +3.8 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 16 | 5♥x | ♦6 | -2 | +5 |
| +3.5 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 15 | 4♠ | ♠5 | -1 | +12 |
| +3.0 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 12 | 4♥ | ♥K | -1 | +5 |
| +2.6 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 11 | 3♥ | ♠K | -1 | +2 |
| +2.6 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 19 | 2♥ | ♦9 | -3 | +1 |
| +2.5 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 1 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | -1 |
| +2.4 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 21 | 6♠ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 3 | 3♠ | ♣K | -2 | -1 |
| +1.7 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 24 | 2♣ | ♥Q | -2 | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 27 | 4♠ | ♣7 | +2 | -11 |
| +0.8 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 9 | 2NT | ♣J | = | -1 |
| +0.8 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 25 | 3NT | ♥A | +1 | +1 |
| +0.5 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 2 | 2♥ | ♥3 | +4 | +9 |
| +0.2 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 2 | 3♣ | ♥K | = | -1 |
| -0.2 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 6 | 1NT | ♥4 | +1 | -10 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 1 | 4♥ | ♦10 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 6 | 6NT | ♣2 | = | +11 |
| -0.8 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 26 | 1NT | ♠7 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 17 | 4♥ | ♦7 | -2 | -7 |
| -2.0 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 8 | 1NT | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.4 | Round 2 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 14 | 2♠ | ♦10 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.4 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 20 | 3♠ | ♥7 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.6 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 5 | 4♠ | ♠2 | -1 | -10 |
| -4.3 | Round 1 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 7 | 4♠ | ♣8 | -1 | -6 |
| -4.9 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 3 | 2♦x | ♣A | -2 | -7 |
| -5.5 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 7 | 6♥ | ♣2 | +1 | -1 |
| -5.9 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 23 | 2♦ | ♥J | -1 | -6 |
| -9.1 | Round 5 | LUDUS | 4 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -10 |