FLODQVIST Sven-Olov · SWEDEN SENIORS

25rank
-6.7Butler · 16 bds
-0.42per board
±2.4swing
+1.62vs par /bd
+0.17adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding +2.00 · play -1.27

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.59/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.17/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 83.3%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·80.0% (5)
Declarer play·50.0% (2)
Defence·83.3% (6)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (3)

vs par by strain: a suit +0.73 (11)

vs par by level: part-score +0.14 (7) · game +2.33 (3) · slam +0.00 (1)

By role: declaring -0.41/bd (+0.86 vs par · 7) · defending -0.42/bd (+2.22 vs par · 9)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.40/bd (+2.25 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -1.24/bd (+1.00 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
QuarterfinalA.MorathJ.Pszczola – P.GawrysOpen16-6.7-0.42+1.62

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+3.1QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND91N♠J+1+0
+2.7QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND33♣♠T=+7
+2.6QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND103N♥7-1+12
+2.0QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND161N♣7=-2
+1.4QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND25♣♠A=-2
+0.1QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND43N♥4+1+11
-0.0QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND63♦♥K=-10
-0.1QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND82♠♣9-1-2
-0.7QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND13♦♣A=+1
-1.0QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND134♠♣K=+0
-1.1QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND143N♠4=-3
-1.7QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND113♠♥K+1+6
-2.3QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND52♥♦J+1-1
-2.7QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND125♥x♠8-1+9
-2.7QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND153♥♦J-2+0
-6.3QuarterfinalAPREO LOGISTIC POLAND76♦♣2=+0