DING Wenxuan · QING HAI

83rank
+11.1Butler · 20 bds
+0.56per board
±5.3swing
-0.20vs par /bd
+0.39adjusted /bd
Butler per round: 22.4 -11.3by round

vs par split: bidding -0.27 · play +0.91

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.16/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.39/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 75.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·66.7% (3)
Declarer play·50.0% (2)
Defence·75.0% (4)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: a suit +0.64 (11)

vs par by level: part-score +1.67 (3) · game +0.25 (8)

By role: declaring -1.02/bd (-4.89 vs par · 9) · defending +1.84/bd (+3.64 vs par · 11)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.94/bd (-0.58 vs par · 12) · not vulnerable -0.03/bd (+0.38 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 2G.LiM.Xi – X.SunClosed10+22.4+2.24-0.90
Round 3G.LiJ.Goenka – S.IyengarOpen10-11.3-1.13+0.50

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+8.5Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER173N♦7-6+3
+8.3Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER195♦x♣A-2+10
+8.2Round 3INDIA RED283N♠4-2+12
+5.9Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER112♥x♥6-2+5
+3.7Round 3INDIA RED265♣♦A=+7
+2.4Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER154♥♠J+2+1
+2.3Round 3INDIA RED234♠♥2+1+0
+1.8Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER122♥♣4+1+0
+1.6Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER134♥♠J-1+6
+0.5Round 3INDIA RED295♦♥5=-2
+0.3Round 3INDIA RED223N♥5=+5
+0.2Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER203N♥6+3-13
-0.4Round 3INDIA RED242♥♠8+1+0
-0.6Round 3INDIA RED211N♣10+2+0
-1.1Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER161N♠J=+1
-1.9Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER143N♣2+4-17
-3.3Round 2PUDONG LUOGEBEIER184♠♦5-2-5
-3.9Round 3INDIA RED303N♥7+1+5
-6.5Round 3INDIA RED273N♥9=-7
-14.9Round 3INDIA RED254♠x♦3-4-15