LAVAZZA Maria Teresa · LAVAZZA
398rank
-0.4Butler · 10 bds
-0.04per board
±2.2swing
-3.50vs par /bd
+1.23adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding -1.57 · play -1.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +1.27/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.23/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | · | 50.0% (2) |
| Defence | · | 100.0% (2) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: a suit -3.29 (7)
vs par by level: part-score -1.00 (5) · game -9.00 (2)
By role: declaring +0.20/bd (-4.50 vs par · 8) · defending -1.00/bd (+0.50 vs par · 2)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.72/bd (-5.17 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable +0.97/bd (-1.00 vs par · 4)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | A.Sementa | A.Dubinin – A.Gromov | Closed | 10 | -0.4 | -0.04 | -3.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.2 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 18 | 3♠ | ♦7 | = | +1 |
| +2.2 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 13 | 1N | ♦10 | +1 | +6 |
| +1.8 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 12 | 3♥ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 15 | 4♥ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 17 | 3♠ | ♣5 | -2 | -7 |
| -0.7 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 20 | 3N | ♣4 | +2 | -13 |
| -0.9 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 19 | 4♦ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 16 | 2♦ | ♠9 | = | +1 |
| -2.8 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 11 | 3N | ♥4 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.9 | Round 2 | RUSSIA | 14 | 5♦ | ♠2 | +2 | -18 |