VERBEEK Tim · HET WITTE 2
vs par split: bidding +2.08 · play +0.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.41/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.56/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 83.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 50.0% (2) |
| Defence | · | 83.3% (6) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.50 (2) · a suit +2.60 (10)
vs par by level: part-score +1.40 (5) · game +4.83 (6) · slam -11.00 (1)
By role: declaring -1.15/bd (-0.83 vs par · 6) · defending -2.80/bd (+5.00 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.67/bd (+3.00 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable -2.28/bd (+1.17 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 16 | D.Molenaar | F.Angelini – B.Brogeland | Open | 12 | -23.7 | -1.97 | +2.08 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.1 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 9 | 2♣ | ♥K | -3 | +1 |
| +2.3 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 1 | 3♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +2 |
| +1.9 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 6 | 4♥ | ♠7 | +1 | +4 |
| +0.9 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 5 | 4♠ | ♦3 | +1 | +13 |
| +0.9 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 7 | 2♠ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 2 | 3NT | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 8 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | +4 |
| -1.1 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 3 | 3NT | ♦8 | +1 | -1 |
| -5.3 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 12 | 3♠ | ♥6 | = | -1 |
| -6.9 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 10 | 5♣ | ♠Q | +1 | +13 |
| -7.9 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 4 | 4♥ | ♣2 | = | +0 |
| -11.0 | Round of 16 | ANGELINI | 11 | 6♥ | ♠6 | -1 | -11 |