SARNIAK Anna · EDMONDS

1rank
+23.4Butler · 14 bds
+1.67per board
±5.9swing
+0.29vs par /bd
+1.36adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.86 · play +1.14

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.31/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.36/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 50.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads0.0% (1)100.0% (1)
Declarer play100.0% (2)100.0% (2)
Defence100.0% (2)100.0% (3)

Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 50.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT +4.33 (6) · a suit -2.75 (8)

vs par by level: part-score -0.67 (3) · game +0.55 (11)

By role: declaring +3.04/bd (-0.67 vs par · 9) · defending -0.80/bd (+2.00 vs par · 5)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.81/bd (-1.29 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable +1.53/bd (+1.86 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalD.KazmuchaK.Bertheau – J.LarssonClosed14+23.4+1.67+0.29

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+11.7SemifinalTRI POLAR23NT♠Q=+10
+7.3SemifinalTRI POLAR134♥♦3=-1
+7.0SemifinalTRI POLAR43♥♦A-2+2
+6.0SemifinalTRI POLAR73NT♣10=-1
+5.7SemifinalTRI POLAR33NT♠3=+7
+4.3SemifinalTRI POLAR93♥♦J=+1
+3.0SemifinalTRI POLAR113NT♦5=-1
+0.3SemifinalTRI POLAR143NT♠J+1+1
+0.0SemifinalTRI POLAR54♥♦9+1+0
+0.0SemifinalTRI POLAR83NT♦J-1+10
-1.3SemifinalTRI POLAR12♠♣2-2-5
-1.3SemifinalTRI POLAR64♠♦A-2+0
-8.0SemifinalTRI POLAR124♠♦5+2-16
-11.3SemifinalTRI POLAR104♥♠A=-3