McCALLUM Karen · BAKER

16rank
-29.2Butler · 14 bds
-2.09per board
±5.2swing
-3.07vs par /bd
-1.72adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -1.43 · play -1.64

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.37/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.72/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 100.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (1)50.0% (2)
Declarer play100.0% (1)33.3% (3)
Defence100.0% (2)100.0% (2)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT +1.25 (4) · a suit -4.80 (10)

vs par by level: part-score -3.29 (7) · game -1.33 (6) · slam -12.00 (1)

By role: declaring -2.92/bd (-6.20 vs par · 10) · defending +0.00/bd (+4.75 vs par · 4)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.70/bd (-5.57 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -1.47/bd (-0.57 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalL.BakerC.Rimstedt – M.MichielsenClosed14-29.2-2.09-3.07

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+8.0SemifinalBRODY126♦♣3+1-12
+3.0SemifinalBRODY113NT♠9=-1
+1.3SemifinalBRODY63♠♣A-1+2
+1.0SemifinalBRODY23♣♠Q=+0
+0.3SemifinalBRODY143NT♦5+1+1
+0.0SemifinalBRODY54♥♠2+1+0
+0.0SemifinalBRODY83NT♣8-1+10
-0.3SemifinalBRODY103♥♠J+1+8
-1.3SemifinalBRODY12♠♥K-2-5
-5.3SemifinalBRODY93♦♥9-3-6
-7.3SemifinalBRODY73♦♠K+1-10
-8.3SemifinalBRODY33NT♦4-1-5
-10.0SemifinalBRODY134♥♦2-1-13
-10.3SemifinalBRODY43♠x♣A-2-12